Jackson 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM
2026 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 40 & Over Men Monday PM
11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA
Schedule3 played
i
Flight standings9 teams · 7.5 40 & Over Men Monday PM
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Beuchler/Sherwood 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM | 3 | 0 | 5 | 68 |
| 2Hilliard 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM | 2 | 0 | 3 | 41 |
| 3Bueller 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM | 2 | 1 | 8 | 67 |
| 4Majestic 40s 7.5 Combo Mon PM | 2 | 1 | 10 | 77 |
| 5Rossato 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM | 1 | 1 | 7 | 53 |
| 6Webster 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM | 1 | 2 | 15 | 99 |
| 7Jackson 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM | 0 | 2 | 8 | 63 |
| 8Chamberlin 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM | 0 | 2 | 9 | 61 |
| 9Miller 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM | 0 | 2 | 9 | 63 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Ron Mangrum + David Rachels | 0–4 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Scott Laughlin + Kevin Navarro | 0–4 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Ron Mangrum + Kevin Hulse | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Todd Hurst + Scott Laughlin | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Kevin Hulse + Kevin Navarro | 0–3 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| David Rachels + Kevin Herndon | 3–0 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Kevin Herndon + Scott Laughlin | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.