Teams

Nolan-Lundstrum/Fayetteville/UREC

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring 1 League · 4.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.33 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-27vs Aniline-Saffran/Rogers/RHSLost 05
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Hollis / Spencer Holloway vs Jackson Arbeitman / Edmund Hui1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesIsaac Lundstrum vs Tho Ho2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSamuel Musser / Kyle Zimmerschied vs Reny Aniline / Sam Page3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDavis Elleman vs Zachary Bowers0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Nolan / Riley Lower vs Joshua Saffran / Andrew Todd6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-22vs Aniline-Saffran/Rogers/RHSLost 03
L#1 DoublesLuke Lundstrum / Davis Elleman vs Sam Page / Zachary Bowers0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCharles Nolan vs Tho Ho5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesSamuel Musser vs Reny Aniline0-6, 0-6
2026-04-16vs Aniline-Saffran/Rogers/RHSLost 03
L#1 DoublesIsaac Lundstrum / Samuel Musser vs Tommy Aniline / Jackson Arbeitman2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJacob Nordin vs Tho Ho1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesCharles Nolan vs Edmund Hui0-6, 3-6
2026-03-12vs Larimer/Springdale/SRCWon 32
W#1 DoublesDavis Elleman / Trevor Mallioux vs Lynn Stewart / Christopher Menendez7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesSamuel Musser vs Logan Wheeler6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharles Nolan / Benjamin Hollis vs Josh Larimer / William Blake3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBrady Long vs Patrick Kinnamon2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJacob Nordin / Spencer Holloway vs Andrew Atkinson / Jacob Holt7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-08vs Larimer/Springdale/SRCWon 32
L#1 DoublesSamuel Musser / Kyle Zimmerschied vs Josh Larimer / Lynn Stewart4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBrady Long vs Matthew Akins1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Hollis / Spencer Holloway vs Andrew Atkinson / Nikolas Simpson6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCharles Nolan vs Jacob Holt6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLuke Lundstrum / Isaac Lundstrum vs Wesley Garner / Azarudeen Jahir Hussain7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-02vs Larimer/Springdale/SRCWon 31
W#1 DoublesCharles Nolan / Davis Elleman vs Christopher Menendez / Michael Roberson6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJacob Nordin vs Patrick Kinnamon6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSamuel Musser / Brady Long vs Azarudeen Jahir Hussain / Mitchell Berry5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesBenjamin Hollis vs Logan Wheeler6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Aniline-Saffran/Rogers/RHS6024614190
2Nolan-Lundstrum/Fayetteville/UREC33111943300

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Jacob Nordin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
Benjamin Hollis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.03
Trevor Mallioux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Charles Nolan
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.02
Kyle Zimmerschied
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.00
Spencer Holloway
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.90
Davis Elleman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.89
Luke Lundstrum
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.87
Brady Long
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.81
Isaac Lundstrum
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Samuel Musser
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Riley Lower
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luke Lundstrum + Davis Elleman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jacob Nordin
6W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Benjamin Hollis
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
4.15
Trevor Mallioux
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
4.03
4.5
Charles Nolan
24W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03
Kyle Zimmerschied
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
Spencer Holloway
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00
4
Davis Elleman
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Luke Lundstrum
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.89
4.5
Brady Long
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.87
4
Isaac Lundstrum
4W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.81
Samuel Musser
4W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
Riley Lower
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.