Teams

Thomasson

2023 Anne Arundel Combo · Anne Arundel Combo 7.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-09-27vs KochLost 01
L#1 DoublesHank Hudson / Adam Thomasson vs Brian Timian / Justin Wagner4-6, 4-6
2023-09-16vs KochLost 01
L#1 DoublesGreg Leihy / Michael McGowan vs Scott A Green / Kushal Patel1-6, 3-6
2023-09-07vs KochWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Isch / Greg Leihy vs Kushal Patel / Jorge Paucar6-4, 6-4
2023-08-26vs KochSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrew Isch / Adam Thomasson vs Scott A Green / Kushal Patel2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChris Anderson / Greg Leihy vs Brian Timian / Justin Wagner6-1, 6-4
2023-08-20vs KochLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Anderson / Greg Leihy vs Scott A Green / Key Sar3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-13vs KochWon 20
W#2 DoublesChris Anderson / Greg Leihy vs Jorge Paucar / Kushal Patel6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAdam Thomasson / Andrew Isch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-08vs KochLost 01
L#3 DoublesPaul Devlin / Adam Thomasson vs Brian Kovalski / Ken Mitchell6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2023-08-02vs KochWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Thomasson / Anthony Hoffman vs Brian Kovalski / Greg Koch6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Combo 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Adam Thomasson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.60
Greg Leihy
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.58
Matthew Kennedy
published
3.50
Michael Witting
published
3.49
Anthony Hoffman
published 4
3.49
Frank von Hendricks
published 3.5
3.49
Michael McGowan
published
3.24
Andrew Isch
published 3.5
Paul Devlin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Thomasson
151W–127L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Christopher Gowen
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Greg Leihy
106W–109L career · 5 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Matthew Kennedy
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Michael Witting
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Anthony Hoffman
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Frank von Hendricks
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Michael McGowan
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Andrew Isch
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
Paul Devlin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.