Teams

USTA Campus-MacKenzie

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 40 & Over - SPRING-NIGHT · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.88 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-11Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLeslie Sanders vs Shaughna Watai4-6, 0-6
2025-06-06vs USTA Campus-WuLost 01
L#1 DoublesApril Filer / Leslie Sanders vs Marissa Woodruff / Valentina Naumenko3-6, 3-6
2025-05-14vs USTA Campus-LuterLost 01
L#1 DoublesApril Filer / Leslie Sanders vs Ella Simsek / Selen Gokce0-6, 1-6
2025-05-07vs Lake Cane-HowlettWon 10
W#1 DoublesApril Filer / Leslie Sanders vs Marika Czerwinski / Kadriye Hasoglu6-2, 6-2
2025-04-23vs USTA Campus-WuLost 01
L#1 SinglesLeslie Sanders vs Fulya Demirel Cumbur0-6, 1-6
2025-04-02vs Lake Cane-HowlettWon 10
W#1 SinglesLeslie Sanders vs Jen Copeland6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Carolyn Moore
published 3
2.83
April Filer
published 3
Eileen Gibson
published 3
2.69
Leslie Sanders
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Jody MacKenzie
published
2.48
Marie George
published
2.38
2.38
Sue Ventura
published
2.31
Susan Cogswell
published
2.18
Ana Sosa
published 2.5
Laurel Stadtmauer
published
Mariko Ford
published
Patricia Milam
published
Phyllis Kalil
published
Stacey Mancuso
published
Susanne Walker
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carolyn Moore
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.21
3
April Filer
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Eileen Gibson
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Sanders
66W–115L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
2.69
Jody MacKenzie
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
Marie George
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Justine Tigno-Aranjuez
13W–23L career · no lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
Sue Ventura
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.38
Susan Cogswell
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Ana Sosa
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Laurel Stadtmauer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mariko Ford
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Milam
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Phyllis Kalil
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Mancuso
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susanne Walker
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.