Teams

Jeter/LR/CCLR

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring 1 League · 4.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.38 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-19vs Harrison/GHS/LRACWon 31
W#1 DoublesMary Rhoades / Meghan Collins vs Jennifer Baptist / Emma Gean7-6, 7-5
L#1 SinglesClaire Doshier vs Becky Sherman4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlexis Freeman / Mary Way vs AMY YATES / Jennifer Quilao7-5, 7-5
W#2 SinglesWhitney Ewersmann vs Catherine Gonzalez6-2, 6-3
2026-04-14vs Jedlicka/LR/RebWon 41
W#1 DoublesMary Rhoades / Jenny Walls vs Meredith Reddmann / Dana Rodriguez6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAshley Hight vs Courtney Jones6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCameron Hafner / Alexis Freeman vs Brooke Smith / Christian Lenderman6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesClaire Doshier vs Tiffani Jedlicka6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Koen / Ashley Younger vs Jenni Orahood / Colleen Youngdahl1-2
2026-04-01vs Jedlicka/LR/RebWon 50
W#1 DoublesMary Way / Jenny Walls vs Jacquelyn Harrison / Andrea Sellew6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesClaire Doshier vs Brooke Smith6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJessie McLarty / Mary Rhoades vs Kati Beth Lewis / Colleen Youngdahl2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAshley Hight vs Courtney Newell6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAshley Younger / Shemeko Corbin vs Tiffani Jedlicka / Jenni Orahood6-3, 6-3
2026-03-15vs Harrison/GHS/LRACWon 41
W#1 DoublesAlexis Freeman / Jenny Walls vs Becky Sherman / Meritt Harrison7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesWhitney Ewersmann vs Jennifer Quilao6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Rhoades / Meghan Collins vs Suzanne Klug / Anita Bucur3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesClaire Doshier vs Eden Raines6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarcie Jeter / Lauren Breaux vs Jennifer Baptist / Tamara McColey6-4, 6-2
2026-02-26vs Harrison/GHS/LRACLost 14
L#1 DoublesMarcie Jeter / Cameron Hafner vs Jennifer Baptist / Austynn Crocker4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesWhitney Ewersmann vs Eden Raines6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJenny Walls / Jessie McLarty vs Jennifer Quilao / Anita Bucur4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAshley Hight vs Olivia Gaston1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Peacock / Shemeko Corbin vs Sara Mitchell / Emma Gean1-6, 1-6
2026-02-10vs Jedlicka/LR/RebWon 50
W#1 DoublesKathryn Peacock / Lauren Breaux vs Tiffani Jedlicka / Kati Beth Lewis7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesClaire Doshier vs Courtney Newell6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarcie Jeter / Jenny Walls vs Brooke Smith / Olivia Fisher6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAshley Hight vs Hannah Heffernan6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKaren Koen / Shemeko Corbin vs Courtney Jones / Meredith Reddmann5-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jeter/LR/CCLR5123717199
2Harrison/GHS/LRAC42181226245
3Jedlicka/LR/Reb0642653322

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Whitney Ewersmann
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.43
Jenny Walls
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.36
Mary Way
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.33
Lauren Breaux
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Cameron Hafner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.23
Claire Doshier
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.22
Mary Rhoades
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.21
Marcie Jeter
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.12
Karen Koen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
Jessie McLarty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Ashley Hight
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.93
Ashley Younger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Shemeko Corbin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Kathryn Peacock
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Meghan Collins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessie McLarty + Marcie Jeter4252% games−19.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitney Ewersmann
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
4.47
Jenny Walls
12W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
4.43
Mary Way
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
4.36
Lauren Breaux
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Cameron Hafner
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Claire Doshier
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
Mary Rhoades
9W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
4.22
Marcie Jeter
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
Karen Koen
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
Jessie McLarty
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.99
4.5
Ashley Hight
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Ashley Younger
32W–9L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
Shemeko Corbin
10W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
3.90
Kathryn Peacock
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.84
Meghan Collins
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.