Teams

HHTL70/Sowers/Spanish Wells

Adult 70 & Over - SC · Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-06vs HHTL70/Colquitt/Spring LakeLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Sowers / Sherry Adams vs Jan Harris / Honey Honymar6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLila Mellen / Carol Mehrling vs Barbara Thompson / Deborah McGee6-7, 0-6
2026-03-23vs HHTL70/Blake/Spring LakeLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshild Athanas / Nancy Hoekstra vs Linda Benning / Julie Scovel3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Mehrling / Lila Mellen vs Susan Blake / Gretchen Griggs6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSheila Smith / Susan Sowers vs Charlotte Cornell / Iris Petrillo7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2026-03-21vs HHTL70/Kenworthy/Spring LakeLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Lawson / Pamela Kurtz vs Judith Ferguson / Carla Wimmer6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAshild Athanas / Sherry Adams vs Patricia Priestley / Susie McLaughlin3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Mehrling / Lila Mellen vs Maureen Riley / Patty Zensinger6-4, 6-4
2026-03-09vs HHTL70/Calcagni/Long CoveWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshild Athanas / Sherry Adams vs Claire Strouse / Tevis Kraft6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPamela Kurtz / Sheila Smith vs Anita Gray / Catherine Forlenza6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Martin / Susan Sowers vs Joyce Hollis / Cindy Green6-3, 6-4
2026-03-02vs HHTL (A) 3.5W 70 & Over (Williams)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Sowers / Sherry Adams vs Gail Bisbee / Suzanne Sears6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPamela Kurtz / Julie Lawson vs Carol Gregory / Sharon Saupp5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Mehrling / Lila Mellen vs Janice Sullivan / Barbara Wilmsen6-4, 6-3
2026-02-23vs HHTL70/McKinley/Spring LakeLost 12
L#1 DoublesPamela Kurtz / Sheila Smith vs Carol MacLennan / Lois McKinley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAshild Athanas / Susan Sowers vs Mary Howe / Nancy Warner5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Lawson / Lila Mellen vs Joanna Fuller / Sharon Geiman6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Pamela Kurtz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Barbara Martin
published 3.5
3.22
Carol Mehrling
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Lila Mellen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.02
Ashild Athanas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Susan Sowers
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Julie Lawson
published
Maryellen Neumann
published
Nancy Hoekstra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sherry Adams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Sowers + Ashild Athanas1447% games+3.6% vs expected
Pamela Kurtz + Barbara Martin7259% games−0.4% vs expected
Nancy Hoekstra + Ashild Athanas3452% games−1.4% vs expected
Carol Mehrling + Lila Mellen101050% games−2.0% vs expected
Susan Sowers + Barbara Martin0525% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Kurtz + Carol Mehrling3252% gamesnot enough data
Susan Sowers + Julie Lawson224 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Kurtz + Ashild Athanas314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Kurtz
31W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Barbara Martin
15W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Carol Mehrling
23W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
Lila Mellen
20W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Ashild Athanas
19W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
3.02
Susan Sowers
22W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Julie Lawson
8W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Maryellen Neumann
3W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Hoekstra
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sherry Adams
36W–26L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.