← Teams

CGM-Borchers/Rey

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Diana Almy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
3.76
Jill Sather
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Yumiko Pike
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Nenette Olson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.47
Becky Rey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Deborah Borchers
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.40
Cindy Rushall
usually #3 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 4
3.09
Lisa Provost
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
—
Gale Volk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results7 ties
2022-11-19Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTami Oglesby / Jill Sather vs Claire Thayer / Monika Dolega-kowalewski6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Cindy Rushall vs Janet Tabor / Sandy Garry6-3, 6-2
2022-11-12Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Jill Sather vs Shannon Fraser / Rhonda Thomas6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesYumiko Pike / Lisa Provost vs Katherine Kralj / Monika Dolega-kowalewski6-0, 6-0
2022-11-05Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBecky Rey / Gale Volk vs Lisa Gray / Kimberly Quach6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTami Oglesby / Yumiko Pike vs Xia Wu / Karen Sullivan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCindy Rushall / Nenette Olson vs Donna Roisom / Linda Fosberg6-3, 6-3
2022-10-30Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Michelle Donato / Deanna Lautenbach6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTami Oglesby / Lisa Provost vs Sarah Morris / Rebecca Redding6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJill Sather / Becky Rey vs Julie Brown / Ursula Mavila6-3, 7-6
2022-10-21Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJill Sather / Tami Oglesby vs Mariniah Prendergast / Stacy Hawkins Parker6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Cynthia McPhee / Trina Denson6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCindy Rushall / Nenette Olson vs Gay Hart / Lisa Handley4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-15Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesYumiko Pike / Gale Volk vs Jackie Dooris / Donna Kennish6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTami Oglesby / Jill Sather vs Julie Hanson / Flor Harrigan6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Provost / Cindy Rushall vs Carla Wheeler / Deanna Peterson6-3, 6-3
2022-09-24Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesBecky Rey / Gale Volk vs Michelle Donato / Cathrine Olander6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Sue Gregoire / Deanna Lautenbach4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill Sather / Cindy Rushall vs Chiho Cronk / Rebecca Redding6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Diana Almy
50W–38L career
not enough data
—
4
Jill Sather
45W–75L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Yumiko Pike
73W–97L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Nenette Olson
122W–164L career
2%98%0%
3.71
4
Becky Rey
26W–49L career
43%57%0%
3.47
4
Deborah Borchers
53W–101L career
46%54%0%
3.46
4
Cindy Rushall
100W–170L career
64%36%0%
3.40
3.5
Lisa Provost
37W–120L career
19%81%0%
3.09
0
Gale Volk
15W–21L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.