Teams

2 Avalon Bland

2024 Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weeknight 7.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-19vs 1 ACAC KOCHWon 10
W#3 DoublesReid Cardon / Richard Bland vs Randy Koch / Rusty Dean6-1, 6-3
2024-06-05vs 4 Burkwood StewartWon 10
W#2 DoublesJames Melson / Richard Bland vs Richard Shute / John N Scott6-2, 6-0
2024-05-21vs 3 ACAC McFadden - DavidWon 10
W#3 DoublesJames Melson / Richard Bland vs Steve Shannon / Joseph Cipolla6-4, 6-2
2024-05-08vs 4 Burkwood StewartWon 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Bland / James Melson vs Floyd Hetzer / John N Scott6-1, 6-3
2024-05-01vs 6 TDC PrinceWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephen Mathews / Richard Bland vs Paul DeLuca / Jim Swisher6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesKumar Raman / Richard Bland vs John Old / Joel Thigpen6-4, 6-2
2024-04-17vs 3 ACAC McFadden - DavidWon 10
W#2 DoublesJames Melson / Richard Bland vs Joseph Cipolla / Steve Shannon2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weeknight 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
James Melson
published
3.38
Kirby Fields
published
3.31
Richard Bland
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.27
Stephen Mathews
published
Alan Stone
published 3.5
3.05
Frank Mason
published
2.99
Glenn Mizrach
published
2.83
Kim Boys
published
2.72
Doug Rechenbach
published
Ira Mogetz
published
Kumar Raman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirby Fields + Stephen Mathews5153% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James Melson
12W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.58
Kirby Fields
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Richard Bland
251W–138L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Stephen Mathews
25W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Alan Stone
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Frank Mason
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
Glenn Mizrach
12W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
Kim Boys
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
2.83
Doug Rechenbach
2W–20L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Ira Mogetz
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kumar Raman
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.