Teams

Laurel Oak Rosenberg

2024 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 8.0 M Thursday

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-04-04vs Sarasota/Mihm/55&Over8.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Rosenberg / Jim Capazola vs Phillip Mihm / Nader Massoumi2-6, 3-6
2024-03-14vs Sarasota/Mihm/55&Over8.0MWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris New / Jim Capazola vs Peter Laughlin / Jim Fiumefreddo6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDave Barcomb / Vivek Kumar vs RON NOURSE / Thomas Schlender6-4, 6-4
2024-03-08vs Sarasota/Mihm/55&Over8.0MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChris New / Jim Capazola vs Mark Panepinto / Nader Massoumi6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDave Barcomb / David Saxe vs Kip Schoonover / Jim Fiumefreddo4-6, 3-6
2024-02-29vs Sarasota/Mihm/55&Over8.0MWon 10
W#3 DoublesJim Capazola / Chris New vs Tim Mihm / William Rhodes6-2, 6-4
2024-02-22vs Sarasota/Mihm/55&Over8.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesJim Capazola / Kenneth Schwartz vs Peter Laughlin / William Rhodes2-6, 3-6
2024-02-15vs Sarasota/Mihm/55&Over8.0MWon 10
W#3 DoublesDave Barcomb / David Saxe vs Kip Schoonover / Tim Mihm6-4, 6-2
2024-02-08vs Sarasota/Mihm/55&Over8.0MWon 10
W#2 DoublesJim Capazola / David Saxe vs Kip Schoonover / RON NOURSE6-3, 6-2
2024-02-01vs Sarasota/Mihm/55&Over8.0MWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Saxe / Jim Capazola vs William Rhodes / Gustavo Risquez6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-01-25vs Sarasota/Mihm/55&Over8.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesJim Capazola / Vivek Kumar vs Gustavo Risquez / Gregory Childers3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 M Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Chris Canfield
published 4.5
4.31
Chris New
published 4.5
4.05
Alan Amero
published 4.5
3.82
Dave Barcomb
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
David Rosenberg
published 4
3.34
Bradley Sutter
published 3.5
Jim Capazola
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Kenneth Schwartz
published
Kevin Spudic
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenneth Schwartz + Bradley Sutter4154% gamesnot enough data
Dave Barcomb + David Rosenberg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Canfield
13W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Chris New
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Alan Amero
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.05
4
Dave Barcomb
54W–67L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
David Rosenberg
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Bradley Sutter
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Jim Capazola
78W–37L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kenneth Schwartz
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Spudic
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.