Teams

SDNC 8.0 SDTC/ Urcelay

2024 Adult 55 & Over Summer- SDNC · SDNC

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Froyd / Eric Harnish vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-04Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLich Le / Robert Froyd vs Mike Moberg / Victor Pascu6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-21vs SDNC 8.0 FRCC/ GehrkeLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Urcelay / Anthony Villasenor vs Howard Farfel / Paul Buckley0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Froyd / Lich Le vs Todd Bulich / Cort Schultz4-6, 0-6
2024-07-14vs SDNC 8.0 El Camino CC/ GentrySplit 11
W#2 DoublesMichael Urcelay / Anthony Villasenor vs Steve Libby / Thomas Lopez7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert Froyd / Stepan Kartsub vs Kien Tran / Richard Gentry6-7, 3-6
2024-06-30vs SDNC WC 8.0 Valley Center/ Ming YeLost 02
L#2 DoublesLich Le / Timothy O'Neill vs Bruce Nguyen / Mark Motluck5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Urcelay / Steven Rubin vs Tom Zokaei / David Yang2-6, 4-6
2024-06-23vs SD 8.0 SDTRC/ AtwoodLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnthony Villasenor / Lich Le vs Scott Atwood / William Witt3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Eric Harnish
published
3.68
Vinh Tran
published
3.61
3.61
Lich Le
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Robert Froyd
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.43
Michael Urcelay
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Craig Hauser
published 4
3.23
Karl Kasai
published
Timothy O'Neill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Froyd + Lich Le3745% gamesnot enough data
Michael Urcelay + Lich Le3545% gamesnot enough data
Michael Urcelay + Robert Froyd134 matchesnot enough data
Michael Urcelay + Craig Hauser213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Harnish
18W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
4.03
Vinh Tran
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Anthony Villasenor
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Lich Le
46W–48L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Robert Froyd
77W–154L career · 4 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
4
Michael Urcelay
35W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.43
4
Craig Hauser
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.42
Karl Kasai
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
3.23
Timothy O'Neill
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.