Teams

Byrd-CC

2026 CORTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring · Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-02-22vs CORTA/Kristin WaltersLost 23
W#1 DoublesMary Daniel / Diana Newman vs Kecia Cawthorne / Barbara Harrell6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesPatricia Spenard vs Tara Tillery6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAngela Byrd / Tammy Briggs vs Aminta Flowers / Laura Lee6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Kraus / Melinda Ellis vs Lori Greeff / Leigh Kosobucki0-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesKristi Scott / Peggy Gund vs Kristin Walters / Ann Campbell6-7, 3-6
2026-02-14vs CORTA/Kristin WaltersLost 13
L#1 DoublesHallie Taylor / Mary Daniel vs Leigh Kosobucki / Elaine Laughbaum3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesPatricia Spenard vs Kecia Cawthorne6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKristi Scott / Tina Lamb vs Michele Snipes / Susan Hrach0-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesPeggy Gund / Melinda Ellis vs Ashley Pezold / Kristin Walters0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.59
Mary Daniel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Tammy Briggs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Melinda Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Angela Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.44
Patricia Spenard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.43
Beth Williams
published 3
2.43
Kristi Scott
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Suzanne Kraus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.25
Hallie Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.24
Audra Beaudoin
published 3
2.02
Tina Lamb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
1.98
Deidre Hinson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.90
Peggy Gund
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deidre Hinson + Tina Lamb2444% games−1.4% vs expected
Mary Daniel + Tina Lamb134 matchesnot enough data
Hallie Taylor + Audra Beaudoin224 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Briggs + Mary Daniel123 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Briggs + Deidre Hinson033 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Briggs + Hallie Taylor033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Daniel + Deidre Hinson033 matchesnot enough data
Deidre Hinson + Hallie Taylor033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Daniel
8W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
Tammy Briggs
7W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
Melinda Ellis
0W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.53
2.5
Angela Byrd
48W–80L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
Patricia Spenard
16W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
3
Beth Williams
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.43
Kristi Scott
6W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.43
Suzanne Kraus
29W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Hallie Taylor
24W–50L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
3
Audra Beaudoin
14W–32L career · no lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.24
Tina Lamb
4W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Deidre Hinson
8W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Peggy Gund
3W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.