Teams

Dickey (Evv Spring Women's 6.5 Combo)

CIN, EV Spring Combo · CITA, EV 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesDawn Dickey / Daria Sevastianova vs Jessica Speicher / Laura Woodyard2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAllison Clark / Flavia Wells vs Sandy Stabenfeldt / Amy Whitehead6-4, 7-5
W#1 DoublesDawn Dickey / Katie Perkins vs Mary Beth Ozete / Cara Miller3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaria Sevastianova / Allison Clark vs Leah Marlow-Wedeking / Donna Schroering6-0, 6-2
L#1 DoublesDaria Sevastianova / Carrie Ann Hillyard vs Angela Cluck / Johnna Cameron1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Perkins / Dawn Dickey vs Casey Richardson / Roxanne Martin6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesFlavia Wells / Susan Crump vs Catherine Bordenet / Brenda Witten6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesDawn Dickey / Carrie Ann Hillyard vs Mindy Walker-quirk / Kathy Ettensohn4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesDaria Sevastianova / Allison Clark vs Casey Richardson / Brenda Witten6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarrie Ann Hillyard / Lindsey Robak vs Angela Cluck / Amy Plymire7-5, 7-5
W#1 DoublesDawn Dickey / Katie Perkins vs Stacy Lambert / Amy Clements6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDaria Sevastianova / Allison Clark vs Julie Flittner / Laura Woodyard6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · CITA, EV 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wedeking (Evv Spring Women's 6.5 Combo)4213512119
2Dickey (Evv Spring Women's 6.5 Combo)429919170
3Flittner (Evv Spring Women's 6.5 Combo)339919142
4Plymire (Evv Spring Women's 6.5 Combo)1551326173

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Dawn Dickey
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.89
Allison Clark
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Daria Sevastianova
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.71
Carrie Ann Hillyard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Katie Perkins
published
Susan Crump
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Dickey + Katie Perkins231850% games+6.1% vs expected
Allison Clark + Daria Sevastianova3250% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Dickey + Carrie Ann Hillyard2346% gamesnot enough data
Daria Sevastianova + Dawn Dickey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dawn Dickey
96W–77L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Allison Clark
19W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Daria Sevastianova
35W–57L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Carrie Ann Hillyard
22W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Katie Perkins
30W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Crump
24W–68L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.