Teams

Broward/Giraldo/A18&Over4.5

2023 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Night · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.45 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-21vs Midtown - NataliaLost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrea Cornelissen / Sally Guerra vs Cindy Conine / Diana C Cardenas6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSahar Moghaddam / Vladlena Funk vs Laura di Lauro / Natalia Moll0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Leighton / Camila Giraldo vs Patricia Velez / Maria Suarez6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-16vs David Park - Nomususu/SammieWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Rickey / Barbara Cabral vs Marci Feder / Helene Buechele7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRENEE ALEXIS / Mariel Cordero vs Sandra Deering / Wendy Sosa7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesVladlena Funk / Sahar Moghaddam vs Samie Lesperance / Gabriela del Mar Rodriguez4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-05-13vs David Park - Nomususu/SammieWon 31
W#1 DoublesMelissa Leighton / Jill Rickey vs Wendy Sosa / Sandra Deering7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesNatasha Torres vs Samie Lesperance6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSally Guerra / Ainara Godoy vs Helene Buechele / Olya Demina6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKatherine Hughes / Vladlena Funk vs Laurie Mathews / Kristina Avila4-6, 5-7
2023-04-29vs Midtown - NataliaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSheri Adler / Andrea Cornelissen vs Natalia Moll / Laura di Lauro6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNatasha Torres vs Gina Zambernardi6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBarbara Cabral / Katherine Hughes vs Amanda Brahim / Patricia Velez3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSally Guerra / Camila Giraldo vs Cindy Conine / Maria Suarez6-2, 6-1
2023-04-22vs David Park - Nomususu/SammieWon 31
W#1 DoublesSheri Adler / Andrea Cornelissen vs Samie Lesperance / Gabriela del Mar Rodriguez6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMariel Cordero vs Kimberly OMahony4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJill Rickey / RENEE ALEXIS vs Paula Gordillo Rodriguez / Olya Demina6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCamila Giraldo / Natasha Torres vs Laurie Mathews / Agnes Sarkadi6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2023-04-08vs Midtown - NataliaWon 31
W#1 DoublesCamila Giraldo / Sally Guerra vs Gina Zambernardi / Maria Vegas de Pardo6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNatasha Torres vs Diana C Cardenas6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSheri Adler / Sahar Moghaddam vs Natalia Moll / Ana Torrellas6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAinara Godoy / Mariel Cordero vs Amanda Brahim / Patricia Velez6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Ainara Godoy
published 4.5
4.44
Natasha Torres
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.38
Sally Guerra
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.37
Andrea Cornelissen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Melissa Leighton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.29
Mariel Cordero
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
Camila Giraldo
published 4.5
4.20
RENEE ALEXIS
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Barbara Cabral
published 4.5
4.05
Jill Rickey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.95
Sahar Moghaddam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
Katherine Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Cornelissen + Sally Guerra4353% gamesnot enough data
Sahar Moghaddam + Natasha Torres4267% gamesnot enough data
Sally Guerra + RENEE ALEXIS3242% gamesnot enough data
Jill Rickey + RENEE ALEXIS2353% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Hughes + Natasha Torres224 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Leighton + Jill Rickey314 matchesnot enough data
Sally Guerra + Jill Rickey224 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Hughes + Sahar Moghaddam303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ainara Godoy
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
4.52
4.5
Natasha Torres
155W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
4.44
4.5
Sally Guerra
158W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
4.38
4.5
Andrea Cornelissen
70W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Melissa Leighton
56W–52L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
Mariel Cordero
97W–93L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Camila Giraldo
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.24
4.5
RENEE ALEXIS
92W–123L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Barbara Cabral
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Jill Rickey
109W–122L career · 3 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Sahar Moghaddam
279W–189L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.95
Katherine Hughes
25W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.