Teams

Rosemary Beach-Cyr

2024 OWB TriLevel 18 & Over · 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-09-29vs Edgewater-JimisonWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie van Kirk / Carlye Zaborski vs Jennifer Whittle / Michelle Shipley6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Asbell / Angie Gibson vs Deanna Jimison / Iman Elkomy6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJanet Guehl / Robyn Prince vs Jennifer Heilmann / Kathy Harres6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-09-25vs Watersound-KnaussWon 21
W#1 DoublesAshley Edmonds / Nora Cyr vs Sherry Dennis / Pamm Chapman6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSherri Marsteller / Robyn Prince vs Carrie Halstead / Deanna Hibbard3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Guehl / Mary Brandman vs Heather Cooper / Denise Thompson6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Carlye Zaborski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Meg Castleberry
published
3.47
Ashley Edmonds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
LeAnne Shumate
published
3.43
Lindy Wood
published
3.39
Michelle Asbell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Debbie Watson
published 3.5
3.33
Laurie Brown
published
3.29
Angie Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Sherri Marsteller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Robyn Prince
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Mary Brandman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Janet Guehl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Jennifer Bekkers
published
Julie van Kirk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nora Cyr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Prince + Jennifer Bekkers4251% games−9.4% vs expected
Michelle Asbell + Laurie Brown5063% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carlye Zaborski
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Meg Castleberry
22W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.53
4
Ashley Edmonds
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
LeAnne Shumate
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
Lindy Wood
21W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Michelle Asbell
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Debbie Watson
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Laurie Brown
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Angie Gibson
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Sherri Marsteller
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Robyn Prince
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.22
Mary Brandman
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
Janet Guehl
22W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
2.91
Jennifer Bekkers
19W–9L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
2.62
Julie van Kirk
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Nora Cyr
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.