Teams

Muirfield

2025 SUMMER Combo Women · Summer 6.5W Combo

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-07-23vs New Albany Country ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesJessie Kremeier / Kelly Ackert vs Laura Harrold / Reem Ghanem4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShani Monk / Jesseca Middleton vs Marilee Hanna / Ashley Lundberg2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Mazurek / Marsha Friedli vs Emily Swanson / Debbie McMunn6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer 6.5W Combo have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Jessie Kremeier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Patricia Mazurek
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Lori Russell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.13
Ann Miksza
published 3.5
2.93
Kelly Ackert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
2.88
Jesseca Middleton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Katie Mazurek
published
2.83
Marsha Friedli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
K'Anne Cox
published
2.75
Shani Monk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Diane Holland
published 3
2.60
Lori Henry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Henry + Diane Holland8759% games+12.4% vs expected
Diane Holland + Marsha Friedli231354% games+2.8% vs expected
Kelly Ackert + Lori Henry201551% games−1.4% vs expected
Kelly Ackert + Marsha Friedli4258% games−5.1% vs expected
Ann Miksza + Jesseca Middleton5157% gamesnot enough data
Lori Henry + Marsha Friedli1540% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Ackert + Jessie Kremeier134 matchesnot enough data
Lori Henry + Jessie Kremeier404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessie Kremeier
120W–50L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Patricia Mazurek
107W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Lori Russell
173W–88L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Ann Miksza
67W–53L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Kelly Ackert
212W–126L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Stephanie Stoflinsky
62W–35L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
Jesseca Middleton
81W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Katie Mazurek
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Marsha Friedli
84W–75L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
K'Anne Cox
26W–22L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Shani Monk
37W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.75
3
Diane Holland
95W–77L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Lori Henry
125W–116L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.