Teams

WI Combo 8.5 Mixed NEL Ogden Addo

2024 WI Combo · WI Combo 8.5 Mixed

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesRachel Sawall / Zach Janssen vs Brian Larson / Debbie Heinen3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesRachel Sawall / Scott Niemi vs Sue Roberts / Nathan Barash6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Addo / Zach Janssen vs Annie Docter / Adam Hawley7-6, 7-5
W#1 DoublesDan Grassl / Jodi Gaskill vs Nathan Barash / Sue Roberts3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScott Niemi / Rachel Sawall vs Adam Hawley / Annie Docter6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesJodi Gaskill / Dan Grassl vs Adam Hawley / Annie Docter6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesScott Niemi / Rachel Sawall vs Nathan Barash / Karlyn Jakusz6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSabrina Tang / Tung Ouy vs Kasey Wandling / Michael Heile6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSabrina Tang / Tung Ouy vs Brian Larson / Karlyn Jakusz6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Combo 8.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.61
Jordan Verbauwhede
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
4.52
Katherine Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
3.92
Patricia Lison-Sheikh
usually #1 Doubles 93%, also #2 Doubles 7% · published 4
3.78
Rachel Sawall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Christine Mayer
published 4
Dan Grassl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Amy Addo
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
Ivor Addo
published
Jacob Stinski
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Jodi Gaskill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Patti Stinski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sabrina Tang
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Scott Niemi
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Tung Ouy
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published
Yves Defrenne
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Zach Janssen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Sawall + Amy Addo10656% games+0.6% vs expected
Patricia Lison-Sheikh + Jordan Verbauwhede6070% gamesnot enough data
Rachel Sawall + Patricia Lison-Sheikh404 matchesnot enough data
Yves Defrenne + Katherine Cunningham224 matchesnot enough data
Patti Stinski + Jodi Gaskill303 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Sawall + Katherine Cunningham303 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Sawall + Scott Niemi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jordan Verbauwhede
21W–8L career · 8 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.61
Katherine Cunningham
40W–11L career · 13 lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
4.52
4
Patricia Lison-Sheikh
187W–43L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.92
Rachel Sawall
63W–40L career · 10 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Christine Mayer
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Dan Grassl
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Amy Addo
24W–13L career · 7 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
Ivor Addo
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jacob Stinski
5W–3L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jodi Gaskill
5W–9L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patti Stinski
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sabrina Tang
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Niemi
15W–0L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tung Ouy
53W–23L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Yves Defrenne
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Zach Janssen
22W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.