Teams

Harrigan/Mohr

2021 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Paula Petrica
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Kelly Mohr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Flor Harrigan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Rie Sasakawa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Takumi Koyama
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results6 ties
2021-08-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesFlor Harrigan / Kelly Mohr vs Ellen Bowman / Cheryl Roloff5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-08-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTakumi Koyama / Rie Sasakawa vs Darci Keljo / Lisa Handley6-3, 6-1
2021-07-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRie Sasakawa / Paula Petrica vs Tarynn Berkman / Sarah Ferrer6-1, 6-1
2021-07-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaula Petrica / Rie Sasakawa vs Erika Finrow / Kim Regalado6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2021-07-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTakumi Koyama / Kelly Mohr vs Sherri Sacconaghi / Heather Dudley6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2021-06-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesFlor Harrigan / Paula Petrica vs Julie Hester / Kristi Vargas6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Paula Petrica
53W–29L career
3%97%0%
3.70
4
Kelly Mohr
115W–58L career
8%92%0%
3.61
4
Flor Harrigan
80W–73L career
25%75%0%
3.52
4
Rie Sasakawa
129W–122L career
75%25%0%
3.36
0
Takumi Koyama
47W–24L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.