Teams

Howard/Ludwig 40+ ES23

2023 ADULT 40 & OVER EARLY START · 3.5 WOMEN

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-30vs Stern: RTC Ladies 40+ ES23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPam Howard / Jennifer Katz vs Ann Baratto / Wendi Stern1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-11-16vs Carney: Over-Served 40+ ES23Won 10
W#3 DoublesPam Howard / Kristin von Seggern vs Marlys Day / Loretta Ellsworth6-1, 6-3
2022-11-09vs Rosenbery: Fall Rose 40+ ES23Won 10
W#3 DoublesPam Howard / Martha Long vs Melonie Sebring / Victoria Maas7-6, 6-4
2022-11-02vs Landrus 40+ ES23Won 10
W#3 DoublesKristin von Seggern / Pam Howard vs Jean Larson / Wendy Stone6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-19vs Brady/Ehle 40+ ES23Lost 01
L#2 SinglesPam Howard vs Winnie Lynott1-6, 2-6
2022-10-05vs Harris 40+ ES23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPam Howard / Julie Katz vs Barb Brown / Connie Weinstein0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Sharon Yson
published
3.70
Martha Long
published
3.40
Sonia Warmuth
published
3.40
Karen Saklad
published
3.34
Elizabeth Micek
published
3.30
Cori Miller
published 3.5
3.29
Lisa Meccia
published
3.27
LISA PECK
published
3.27
Charlyn Francisco
published 3.5
3.24
Stacy Ludwig
published
3.19
Susan Streif
published
3.09
Pam Howard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Jennifer Katz
published
Kristin von Seggern
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Saklad + Cori Miller16163% games+4.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Yson
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.87
Martha Long
51W–46L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Sonia Warmuth
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.40
Karen Saklad
25W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Elizabeth Micek
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Cori Miller
18W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Lisa Meccia
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
LISA PECK
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Charlyn Francisco
22W–31L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Stacy Ludwig
14W–17L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Susan Streif
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Pam Howard
172W–113L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.09
Jennifer Katz
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristin von Seggern
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.