Teams

LNCH-Cheatham/PAC

2025 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 7.5 Women 40s

10 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-26vs LSCA-Cantey-Podesta/PeninsulaLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Jenkins / Cindy Houser vs Jennifer Garcia / Danielle Mikolajczyk2-6, 4-6
2025-09-12vs LLWI-Winter-Smith/LNRCLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharlene Whichel / Cindy Houser vs Jessica Benningfield / Darlene Scripter2-6, 3-6
2025-08-29vs LCAP-Aprile-Ortiz/River RunWon 10
W#2 DoublesTrish Behnke / Christine Bogojevich vs Ana Endsjo / Terri Utz7-6, 6-3
2025-08-28vs LSBR-Brynn/NMPWon 20
W#1 DoublesCharlene Whichel / Christine Bogojevich vs Kristine Bienstock / Beth Kieley6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLois Forti / Cindy Houser vs Eren Hendricks / Patricia Arrowood1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-15vs LWKI-King/CSD SPARTANWon 10
W#3 DoublesLois Forti / Cindy Houser vs Mary Clare Hainsworth / Emalie Levine7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 40s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Charlene Whichel
published 4
Christine Nilson
published 4
3.47
Christine Bogojevich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Trish Behnke
published
3.25
Jan Wildman
published
3.23
Cindy Houser
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Amy Marin
published 3.5
Elizabeth Norton
published
Lois Forti
published
Norma Cheatham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Bogojevich + Cindy Houser7159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlene Whichel
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Christine Nilson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Christine Bogojevich
163W–96L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Trish Behnke
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
Jan Wildman
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Cindy Houser
73W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Amy Marin
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Elizabeth Norton
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lois Forti
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Norma Cheatham
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.