Teams

Hirsh

2026 40&Over Mixed · 9.0

20 players · average NTRP 4.45 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-13vs TangLost 02
L#1 DoublesTim Wildin / Amelie Bruzat vs Kellie Mee / Sumer Sharma6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPaddi Hurley / Kramer Rice vs Arun Chokkalingam / Robin Lieberman1-6, 2-6
2026-08-04vs TangLost 03
L#1 DoublesTim Wildin / Amelie Bruzat vs Stephanie Gerst / GRIFFIN STANTON-AMEISEN1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesPaddi Hurley / Kramer Rice vs Robin Lieberman / Robert Moynihan2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJulie Veto / Isagani Soriano Aves vs Kellie Mee / Jason Misner1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-07-30vs TangLost 02
L#1 DoublesTexer Nam / Cintia Shiro vs Kellie Mee / David Sheng0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Veto / Marc Lieberman vs Stephanie Gerst / Arun Chokkalingam4-6, 0-6
2026-07-22vs TangLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Lashnits / Julia Milne vs Kellie Mee / Sumer Sharma4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Durand / Tim Wildin vs Stephanie Gerst / David Sheng2-6, 2-6
2026-07-14vs TangLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulia Milne / Wulf Lueckerath vs Kellie Mee / Sumer Sharma6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAyako Minatodani / Texer Nam vs Vladi Tsipenyuk / Stephanie Gerst2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Durand / Marc Lieberman vs Anna Tang / David Sheng6-2, 7-5
2026-03-22vs Carefree, Pflaumer/ChafferLost 01
L#1 DoublesIsagani Soriano Aves / Mehves Kocak-Elci vs Michele Griffith / Jeffrey Snow1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Isagani Soriano Aves
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 4.5
4.35
Wulf Lueckerath
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
4.29
Eli Stahl
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
Francisco Gomez
published 4.5
4.23
Julia Milne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Amelie Bruzat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Tim Wildin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.15
Cintia Shiro
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
John Lashnits
published
4.05
Michael Coleman
published
4.03
Ayako Minatodani
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Julie Veto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Texer Nam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.94
Stephanie Durand
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Erin Murphy
published 4.5
3.72
Marc Lieberman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Paddi Hurley
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Jonathan Hirsh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kramer Rice
published
Sanae Oyama Diller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Texer Nam + Julie Veto9456% games−0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Isagani Soriano Aves
136W–104L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
4.36
Wulf Lueckerath
191W–83L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Eli Stahl
19W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Francisco Gomez
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Julia Milne
20W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Amelie Bruzat
31W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
4.18
Tim Wildin
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Cintia Shiro
264W–196L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
4.15
John Lashnits
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
4.15
Michael Coleman
25W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
4.05
4.5
Ayako Minatodani
15W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03
4.5
Julie Veto
149W–89L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
4.02
4.5
Texer Nam
155W–70L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
Stephanie Durand
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.94
4.5
Erin Murphy
31W–13L career · no lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.74
Marc Lieberman
14W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Paddi Hurley
240W–203L career · 15 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.63
Jonathan Hirsh
40W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Kramer Rice
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sanae Oyama Diller
20W–28L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.