Teams

Apex:Maganti

2026 ME Adult 65 & Over Women · 6.0 65 & Over Women

10 players · average NTRP / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-16vs Apex:DoyleLost 12
L#1 DoublesTana Leonhart / Rebecca Love vs Jennifer Alcock / Susan Thompson1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Sullivan / Susan Robbins vs Catalina Mehler / Marsha Traill4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLynda Schuepp / Julie Faure vs Nancy Osborne / Linda Coupe6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-09vs Apex:DoyleLost 12
L#1 DoublesPhilomena Ostapchuk / Theresa Sullivan vs Diana Doyle / Susan Thompson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarilee Harris / Susan Robbins vs Jennifer Alcock / Charlotte Pease6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Faure / Tana Leonhart vs Marsha Traill / Nancy Osborne6-2, 6-4
2026-06-06vs MP:SplitSteppers:CriscitielloWon 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca Love / Theresa Sullivan vs Debbie Stevenson / Katherine Harding7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPhilomena Ostapchuk / Tana Leonhart vs Margaret Zellinger / Alyson Cummings6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Faure / Marykay Cooney vs Barbara Fraumeni / Janet Wong3-6, 1-6
2026-05-31vs MP:SplitSteppers:CriscitielloLost 12
L#1 DoublesTana Leonhart / MERYL E Nierman vs Wendy Greenbaum / Debbie Stevenson4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPhilomena Ostapchuk / Susan Robbins vs Mary McKone / Katherine Harding4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarykay Cooney / Julie Faure vs Janet Wong / Martha Janeway6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-29vs Apex:DoyleLost 03
L#1 DoublesTana Leonhart / Theresa Sullivan vs Diana Doyle / Susan Thompson0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarilee Harris / Susan Robbins vs Jennifer Alcock / Catalina Mehler2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMERYL E Nierman / Marykay Cooney vs Linda Coupe / Nancy Osborne0-6, 6-7
2026-05-16vs MP:SplitSteppers:CriscitielloWon 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca Love / Theresa Sullivan vs Alyson Cummings / Katherine Harding6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesPhilomena Ostapchuk / Julie Faure vs Wendy Greenbaum / Cindy Fahay6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTana Leonhart / Marykay Cooney vs Julie Criscitiello / Mary McKone0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0 65 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Apex:Doyle6013511123
2Apex:Maganti2471124175
3MP:SplitSteppers:Criscitiello1571125183

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Marilee Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Rebecca Love
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Philomena Ostapchuk
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Julie Faure
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.67
Tana Leonhart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
MERYL E Nierman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Marykay Cooney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lynda Schuepp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Robbins
published
Theresa Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MERYL E Nierman + Lynda Schuepp5352% games+0.4% vs expected
Philomena Ostapchuk + Julie Faure2449% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marilee Harris
75W–94L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Rebecca Love
18W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.84
Philomena Ostapchuk
33W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Julie Faure
116W–109L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Tana Leonhart
26W–52L career · 6 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
MERYL E Nierman
28W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Marykay Cooney
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40
Lynda Schuepp
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Susan Robbins
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Theresa Sullivan
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.