Teams

South Jordan-Shino

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.0M

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-26vs Wasatch Hills Tennis-AtkinLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Scranton / Seth Thompson vs Claudio Torres / Gopal Chemiti2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHal Crimmel / Russell Shino vs Dang Quach / Ahmed Mohammed6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBaovuong Nguyen / Justin Needham vs Brian Tippetts / Russell Marchant3-6, 3-6
2022-05-19vs Liberty Park Tennis-WhiteLost 12
W#1 DoublesHal Crimmel / James Scranton vs Spencer Angstman / Jason McNeill6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRussell Shino / Douglas Wirthlin vs Chris White / Todd Woods3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJustin Needham / Alberto Cohen vs Timothy McNeill / Todd McNeill1-6, 2-6
2022-05-14vs Liberty Park Tennis-McKeeWon 21
L#1 DoublesRobert Scranton / Hal Crimmel vs Greg Nickel / Michael Dapper6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRussell Shino / Douglas Wirthlin vs Serdar Akkor / Clayton Williams6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlberto Cohen / Justin Needham vs Jeff Ward / Riley Nelson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-05-12vs Sports Mall-Amundsen/GannawayWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobert Scranton / James Scranton vs Michael Nelson / Michael Olson6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHal Crimmel / Russell Shino vs Tommaso de Fernex / Romeo Noori6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDouglas Wirthlin / Alberto Cohen vs Alex Raymond / Gabriel Tapia0-6, 3-6
2022-04-30vs Sports Mall-Granger/OsleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Scranton / James Scranton vs Christopher Ahearn / Mike Logan4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRussell Shino / Hal Crimmel vs Rodrigo Nascimento / Carter Smith3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSeth Thompson / Douglas Wirthlin vs James Soares / Devin Liljenquist6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-28vs Ivory Ridge-Bleak/PayneLost 12
W#1 DoublesJames Scranton / Robert Scranton vs Jeff Peterson / Chris Bleak2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHal Crimmel / Russell Shino vs Chad Cox / Alex Miller3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDouglas Wirthlin / Alberto Cohen vs Paul Lewis / Brandon Eliason6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-04-21vs Sports Mall-Granger/OsleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Scranton / Justin Needham vs Brad Gause / Floyd Gordon2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHal Crimmel / Seth Thompson vs Jake Johnson / Devin Liljenquist6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDouglas Wirthlin / Marcus Theodore vs Mike Logan / Rick Hagen1-6, 1-6
2022-04-14vs Liberty Park Tennis-McKeeLost 12
W#1 DoublesJames Scranton / Robert Scranton vs Ryne Hazen / Chris Roybal6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRussell Shino vs Brad Allen0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDouglas Wirthlin / Alberto Cohen vs Ben McKee / Travis Thompson3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

James Scranton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Robert Scranton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Baovuong Nguyen
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Douglas Wirthlin
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.12
Russell Shino
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3.5
Alberto Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Hal Crimmel
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Justin Needham
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Marcus Theodore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Seth Thompson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Russell Shino + Hal Crimmel3650% games+4.3% vs expected
James Scranton + Robert Scranton15951% games+0.5% vs expected
Douglas Wirthlin + Alberto Cohen2737% games−6.5% vs expected
Douglas Wirthlin + Russell Shino11236% games−11.0% vs expected
Hal Crimmel + James Scranton404 matchesnot enough data
Hal Crimmel + Robert Scranton134 matchesnot enough data
Douglas Wirthlin + Marcus Theodore033 matchesnot enough data
Russell Shino + Alberto Cohen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Scranton
22W–11L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Scranton
29W–36L career · 6 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Baovuong Nguyen
42W–53L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Douglas Wirthlin
23W–68L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Russell Shino
44W–73L career · 7 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Alberto Cohen
28W–79L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Hal Crimmel
17W–23L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Justin Needham
8W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marcus Theodore
1W–16L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Seth Thompson
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.