Teams

KY/LOU/MANN/VOLLMER

2022 USTA MIXED 18 & Over · 7.0 ADULT MIXED

19 players · average NTRP 3.70 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.0 ADULT MIXED have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Jennifer Kang
published
3.74
Olivia Eberenz
published
3.73
Caitlin Mann
published 4
3.71
Barrett Buky
published 4
3.69
Tyler Westfaul
published
3.68
Mary Wallitsch
published
3.52
Kendra Purvis
published
3.47
Billy McGlone
published 3.5
3.46
Charles Goodwin
published 3.5
3.43
Noah Allgeier
published
3.40
Jason Caldwell
published
3.40
Shelby Russell
published
3.38
Juan Quintero
published
3.35
Julie Vollmer
published
Brittany Byrd
published 3.5
3.06
Stephen Diehl
published
Rona Martins
published
Scott Wallitsch
published
Stephen Edling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Wallitsch + Mary Wallitsch7261% games−0.0% vs expected
Shelby Russell + Billy McGlone404 matchesnot enough data
Shelby Russell + Charles Goodwin213 matchesnot enough data
Charles Goodwin + Julie Vollmer123 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Edling + Kendra Purvis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Kang
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
4.01
Olivia Eberenz
14W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Caitlin Mann
21W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Barrett Buky
41W–49L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Tyler Westfaul
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Mary Wallitsch
53W–21L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Kendra Purvis
21W–26L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Billy McGlone
43W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Charles Goodwin
35W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
Noah Allgeier
7W–16L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.43
Jason Caldwell
68W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Shelby Russell
61W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Juan Quintero
24W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Julie Vollmer
27W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Brittany Byrd
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Diehl
36W–31L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
Rona Martins
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Wallitsch
28W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Edling
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.