Teams

Hilliard/Tuhro 18s 3.0W Singles Sunday

2026 Piedmont Singles 18+ · 3.0 Women Singles

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-08-09vs Payne 18s 3.0W Singles SundayWon 20
W#1 SinglesRebecca Sheppard vs Suki Gutierrez6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCatherine Johnstone vs Diana Angeles6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRebecca Sheppard vs Cozetta Gaines6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesShelly Tuhro vs Caroline Jackson6-2, 6-0
2026-07-26vs Olalere 18s 3.0W Singles SundayWon 20
W#1 SinglesMary Chandler Batchelor vs Annie Vorys6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Christi Womble6-1, 6-1
2026-07-19vs East 18s 3.0W Singles SundayWon 30
W#1 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Alexa Smith6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSammie Jo McCluskey vs Rebekah East6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesRebecca Sheppard vs Barbara Michael6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMary Chandler Batchelor vs Rachel Bryant6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRebecca Sheppard vs Violet Sprange2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesGinger Ballard vs Meredith Foley6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Stephanie Oudinot6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSydney Wittman vs Allison Chisholm6-1, 6-2
2026-06-21vs Olalere 18s 3.0W Singles SundayWon 30
W#1 SinglesMary Chandler Batchelor vs Kimberley Cathey6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Andrea Spencer6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesSammie Jo McCluskey vs Christi Womble6-2, 6-3
2026-06-19vs East 18s 3.0W Singles SundayWon 30
W#1 SinglesSammie Jo McCluskey vs Nancy Stoddard4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Ashton Choros6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesCatherine Johnstone vs Barbara Michael6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMary Chandler Batchelor vs Josslyn Hizer6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesGinger Ballard vs Rachel Bryant4-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesRebecca Sheppard vs Stephanie Adams6-3, 6-0
2026-05-31vs Payne 18s 3.0W Singles SundayWon 30
W#1 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Diana Angeles6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSydney Wittman vs Suki Gutierrez6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesShelly Tuhro vs Tia Opyd6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Ginger Ballard
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
3.19
Rebecca Sheppard
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.06
Mary Chandler Batchelor
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.05
Shelly Tuhro
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.01
Misty Hilliard
published
3.00
Sammie Jo McCluskey
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.97
Clara Gonzalez Flores
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 44% · published 3
2.94
Catherine Johnstone
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.77
Sydney Wittman
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sammie Jo McCluskey + Catherine Johnstone8071% games+12.5% vs expected
Shelly Tuhro + Ginger Ballard4260% games+7.4% vs expected
Shelly Tuhro + Misty Hilliard4159% gamesnot enough data
Mary Chandler Batchelor + Shelly Tuhro303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ginger Ballard
93W–38L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.28
Rebecca Sheppard
55W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.19
Mary Chandler Batchelor
19W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Shelly Tuhro
47W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.05
Misty Hilliard
34W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Sammie Jo McCluskey
36W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Clara Gonzalez Flores
43W–27L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Catherine Johnstone
34W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
Sydney Wittman
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.