Teams

Proctor 3.0M 18

2026 Fall 18 & Over 2.5W - 4.5 · 3.0 Adult 18 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-29vs Price Men 3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBret Waldrep / Charles Joiner vs Drew Spry / David Cooper3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKevin Stone vs Matthew Price4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJoey Rushing / Brandon Rich vs Mitchell Ryan / Donald Anderson6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2025-11-20vs Price Men 3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSteven Derrick / Kevin Stone vs David Cooper / Ron Lotz7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCharles van Heyden vs Mitchell Ryan1-6
L#2 DoublesJoey Rushing / Brandon Rich vs Louis Gardner de Beville / Donald Anderson2-6, 0-6
2025-11-13vs Price Men 3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Seal / Kevin Stone vs Jonathan Scogin / Louis Gardner de Beville4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCharles van Heyden vs Donald Anderson6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrandon Rich / Steven Derrick vs Mitchell Ryan / David Cooper2-6, 3-6
2025-11-05vs Price Men 3.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesCharles Joiner / Kevin Stone vs Louis Gardner de Beville / David Cooper4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBret Waldrep vs Matthew Price6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristopher Proctor / John Seal vs Donald Anderson / Daniel Robinson6-4, 6-2
2025-10-30vs Price Men 3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCharles Joiner / John Seal vs Mitchell Ryan / Ron Lotz1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesChristopher Proctor vs Louis Gardner de Beville5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJoey Rushing / Bret Waldrep vs Drew Spry / Jonathan Scogin7-5, 6-3
2025-10-23vs Price Men 3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Seal / Kevin Stone vs Matthew Price / Daniel Robinson6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSteven Derrick vs Ron Lotz2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrandon Rich / Charles van Heyden vs David Cooper / Drew Spry6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-16vs Price Men 3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBrandon Rich / Christoper Speck vs Louis Gardner de Beville / Mitchell Ryan4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKevin Stone vs Donald Anderson6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSteven Derrick / Joey Rushing vs Drew Spry / David Cooper5-7, 3-6
2025-10-08vs Price Men 3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChristopher Proctor / Joey Rushing vs Daniel Robinson / Louis Gardner de Beville2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCharles Joiner vs Mitchell Ryan3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSteven Derrick / John Seal vs Donald Anderson / Drew Spry7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Adult 18 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Price Men 3.07116821197
2Proctor 3.0M 181781633234

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Bret Waldrep
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.08
Christopher Proctor
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Steven Derrick
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.87
Kevin Stone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.83
Joey Rushing
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Charles van Heyden
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Brandon Rich
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Christoper Speck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
John Seal
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.65
Charles Joiner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Proctor + Steven Derrick6464% games+12.1% vs expected
Christopher Proctor + Joey Rushing2544% games+5.3% vs expected
Steven Derrick + Kevin Stone2445% games−3.5% vs expected
Joey Rushing + Kevin Stone2742% games−10.9% vs expected
Steven Derrick + Joey Rushing2545% games−12.7% vs expected
Christopher Proctor + Charles Joiner5263% gamesnot enough data
Christopher Proctor + Kevin Stone224 matchesnot enough data
Charles Joiner + Kevin Stone033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bret Waldrep
9W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.10
3
Christopher Proctor
47W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
Steven Derrick
19W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Kevin Stone
19W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Joey Rushing
16W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Charles van Heyden
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Brandon Rich
1W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Christoper Speck
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
John Seal
4W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Charles Joiner
10W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.