Teams

Pipes/18/6.5/Combo/Fors

2026 Monroe Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 6.5 Monroe (18&O) Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 10 6:00 PM
Forsythe Tennis Center
Sep 17 6:00 PM
Forsythe Tennis Center
Sep 24 6:00 PM
Forsythe Tennis Center
2026-08-27vs Arcilla/18/6.5/Combo/ForsWon 21
L#1 DoublesTodd Wasson / Bill Prescott vs Ben Browning / Alex Medina1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCaleb Pipes / Henry Thompson vs Chris Hunt / Evan Crayford6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Sartor / Robert Williamson vs James Lamar / Javen Jones4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-20vs Arcilla/18/6.5/Combo/ForsLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlex Haggblom / Henry Thompson vs Andrew Philley / Alex Medina5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Williamson / Aaron Cox vs Aftab Krishna / James Lamar6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPhung Nguyen / Scotty Fletcher vs Ben Browning / Armand Arcilla5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Monroe (18&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pipes/18/6.5/Combo/Fors000000
2Arcilla/18/6.5/Combo/Fors000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alex Haggblom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bill Prescott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Aaron Cox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Caleb Pipes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Paul Sartor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Phung Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Scotty Fletcher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Todd Wasson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alex Haggblom
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Bill Prescott
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Aaron Cox
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Caleb Pipes
24W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
0%38%62%
2.54
Paul Sartor
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Phung Nguyen
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Scotty Fletcher
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Todd Wasson
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.