Teams

AV - Desert Aces

2025 Mixed 18+ Winter · AV 18 & Over - 7.0 MxD

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesJoseph Theisen / Natalie Miller vs Jose Roel Mendoza / Angela Tirado4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGrant Fosberg / Neva Lequin vs Royce Kaufman / Vicky Vogel2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesLENI GERASS / Damian Roches vs Rebecca Reynolds / Allan Clarkson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaurie Hu / Grant Fosberg vs Veronica Clarkson / Robert Lenton6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMick Ono / Laurie Hu vs Frank Devera / Dianne Wellbaum6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEric Miller / Neva Lequin vs Allan Clarkson / Michelle Lewis2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesLENI GERASS / Damian Roches vs Vicky Vogel / Frank Devera4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesGrant Fosberg / Laurie Hu vs Robert Lenton / Veronica Clarkson1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesVictor Holt / Natalie Reina vs Jose Roel Mendoza / Angela Tirado3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for AV 18 & Over - 7.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Ian Twyford
published
Damian Roches
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Grant Fosberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Theisen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
LENI GERASS
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laurie Hu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mick Ono
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Reina
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Neva Lequin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Victor Holt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Hu + Grant Fosberg033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ian Twyford
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Damian Roches
0W–2L career · type M · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Carol Pleasant-Johnson
1W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Grant Fosberg
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Theisen
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
LENI GERASS
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Hu
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mick Ono
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Reina
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Neva Lequin
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Victor Holt
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.