Teams

Granath/Torres

Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.0W

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-12vs BrileySplit 22
W#1 DoublesJulie Manuel / Jacqueline Robles vs Lela Batten / Troi Middleton6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLuli Martinez vs Rikki Sarabia Bosmans1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGinger Granath / Catherine Cuenca-Torres vs Lisa Alexander / Annette Schwartz6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBridget Barbee / Tiffany Halsell vs Sylvia Guadarrama / Theresa Welch7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2026-02-26vs BrileyLost 12
W#1 DoublesStaci Wetz / MonaLisa Fischer vs Annette Schwartz / Lisa Alexander7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCatherine Cuenca-Torres / Jacqueline Robles vs Amelia Soto / Troi Middleton2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJody Jones / Tiffany Halsell vs Mary Vega / Theresa Welch2-6, 4-6
2026-02-19vs BrileyLost 12
W#1 SinglesGinger Granath vs Rikki Sarabia Bosmans6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Manuel / Jacqueline Robles vs Mary Vega / Melia Pullig7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMonaLisa Fischer / Jody Jones vs Michelle Chapa / Amelia Soto0-6, 2-6
2026-02-12vs BrileySplit 22
L#1 DoublesJulie Manuel / MonaLisa Fischer vs Kristi Briley / Troi Middleton2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLuli Martinez vs Mary Vega1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTiffany Halsell / Staci Wetz vs Rikki Sarabia Bosmans / Theresa Welch2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBridget Barbee / Catherine Cuenca-Torres vs Lauren Coston / Lisa Alexander6-1, 6-4
2026-02-05vs BrileyLost 13
L#1 DoublesMonaLisa Fischer / CoCo Simpson vs Michelle Chapa / Sylvia Guadarrama3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLuli Martinez vs Kristi Briley2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBridget Barbee / Ginger Granath vs Lauren Coston / Lisa Alexander6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJody Jones / Jacqueline Robles vs Rikki Sarabia Bosmans / Theresa Welch2-6, 2-6
2026-01-29vs BrileyLost 04
L#1 DoublesBridget Barbee / Ginger Granath vs Lela Batten / Troi Middleton7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLuli Martinez vs Kristi Briley1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCoCo Simpson / MonaLisa Fischer vs Amelia Soto / Rikki Sarabia Bosmans5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Cuenca-Torres / Staci Wetz vs Annette Schwartz / Melia Pullig2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Adult 40 & Over 3.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Granath/Torres0671736250

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Staci Wetz
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
2.89
Bridget Barbee
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.83
Jacqueline Robles
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
CoCo Simpson
usually #4 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.82
Catherine Cuenca-Torres
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
MonaLisa Fischer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.73
Tiffany Halsell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Ginger Granath
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.58
Julie Manuel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Luli Martinez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.48
Jody Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MonaLisa Fischer + CoCo Simpson2348% games+7.1% vs expected
CoCo Simpson + Bridget Barbee3350% games+5.5% vs expected
MonaLisa Fischer + Ginger Granath3646% games+4.4% vs expected
Catherine Cuenca-Torres + Ginger Granath2538% gamesnot enough data
MonaLisa Fischer + Catherine Cuenca-Torres2452% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Cuenca-Torres + Staci Wetz3252% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Cuenca-Torres + Bridget Barbee3262% gamesnot enough data
MonaLisa Fischer + Julie Manuel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Staci Wetz
54W–66L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Bridget Barbee
19W–35L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
Jacqueline Robles
13W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
CoCo Simpson
23W–42L career · 12 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Catherine Cuenca-Torres
25W–52L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
MonaLisa Fischer
14W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Tiffany Halsell
8W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Ginger Granath
17W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Julie Manuel
27W–65L career · 9 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.58
Luli Martinez
0W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
Jody Jones
4W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.