Teams

KY/LEX/Smith

2025 USTA FALL LEAGUE 18 & Over · 3.5 MEN

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-21vs KY/LEX/Ferretti-PerniceLost 12
L#1 DoublesJacob Senters / Martin Summers vs Braeden Janetzke / Carson Shumate6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCaeden Bartley vs Nathan Bay2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatrick Hancock / Jon Terry vs Joe Ross / Gregory Miller4-6, 2-6
2025-10-21vs KY/LEX/Ferretti-PerniceWon 30
W#1 DoublesRandall Owens / Derrick Smith vs David Fields / Carson Shumate6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJon Terry vs Seth Garcia6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEvan Brown / Morgan Cordray vs David Ferretti / Gerald Slone6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Randall Owens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Jon Terry
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Jason Hawley
published
3.40
Jacob Senters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Martin Summers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Ryan McQuerry
published
3.33
Patrick Hancock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Derrick Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Caeden Bartley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Evan Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Mark Vinas
published
Morgan Cordray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Terry + Evan Brown314 matchesnot enough data
Randall Owens + Derrick Smith303 matchesnot enough data
Patrick Hancock + Jon Terry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Randall Owens
24W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Jon Terry
28W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.47
Jason Hawley
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Jacob Senters
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Martin Summers
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Ryan McQuerry
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Patrick Hancock
18W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Derrick Smith
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Caeden Bartley
2W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Evan Brown
15W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Mark Vinas
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Morgan Cordray
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.