Teams

Smith18

2026 Anniston · Gadsden

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · Gadsden
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PC-Wilkinson41114876
2Smith181441123160

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Kathy McLeod
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.52
Debra Burson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Wendy Buchheit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Allison Lehman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Roberta Leach
usually #2 Doubles 90%, also #1 Doubles 10% · published
3.30
DeDe Clary
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Robin Holley
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
3.25
Kristi Dutton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Laura Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Rene Sheffield
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Cindy Gilmore
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Sheila Gambrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Holley + Roberta Leach15954% games+3.0% vs expected
Robin Holley + Kathy McLeod4162% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Gilmore + Laura Ryan314 matchesnot enough data
DeDe Clary + Allison Lehman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy McLeod
15W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Debra Burson
8W–18L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
Wendy Buchheit
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Allison Lehman
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Roberta Leach
43W–29L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
DeDe Clary
44W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Robin Holley
56W–32L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Kristi Dutton
36W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Laura Ryan
22W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.11
Rene Sheffield
17W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Cindy Gilmore
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.67
Sheila Gambrell
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.