Teams

Cochran 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 18 & Over Men Thurs PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesConner McGowan / Nicholas Baxendell vs Bryan Vescio / Kevin Thoma3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChuck Burns / Eric Nocera vs Neil Henderson / Andrew Hjelt2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-08-27vs Falvey 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesJ Stacey Allred / Conner McGowan vs Stephen Keaney / Johan Nordmark4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSamraat Saxena / Chuck Burns vs Tommy Houston / Corey Davis7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCaleb Wilson / Eric Nocera vs Craig Freed / Lee Thompson6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesJohn Hankinson / Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan vs Fred Ortmann / Bryan Jones6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDan Clemson / Andrew Elsdon vs Cory Orms / Jack Walsh7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesConner McGowan / Caleb Wilson vs Aaron Strasser / Howard Driggers4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-13vs Beuchat 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesEric Nocera / Conner McGowan vs Alexis Beuchat / Polo Carrera7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Cochran / John Hankinson vs Kwamba Nkembe / Preston Thomas6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSamraat Saxena / Chuck Burns vs Kyle McCandless / Charles Chuang7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.5 18 & Over Men Thurs PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fleihan/Winter 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM2051340
2Cochran 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM1021225
3Gamble/Cardinal 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM1133762
4Falvey 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM0112430
5Beuchat 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM02151172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.69
John Hankinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.26
Chuck Burns
published 4.5
4.01
Dan Clemson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Conner McGowan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.75
Eric Nocera
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.72
Andrew Elsdon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.69
Caleb Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
J Stacey Allred
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Nicholas Baxendell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Matthew Cochran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Samraat Saxena
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Hankinson + Nicholas Baxendell213 matchesnot enough data
Nicholas Baxendell + Eric Nocera033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Hankinson
35W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.69
4.5
Chuck Burns
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Dan Clemson
26W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.01
4.5
Conner McGowan
8W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.99
4
Eric Nocera
19W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Andrew Elsdon
8W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.72
3.5
Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan
90W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.69
4
Caleb Wilson
5W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.69
4
J Stacey Allred
12W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Nicholas Baxendell
4W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
Matthew Cochran
13W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
Samraat Saxena
3W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.