Teams

Grand Dames of TYCC - S. Ellis

2024 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Davis / Deborah Lamphier vs Janet George / Lisa McCarthy3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-03-16vs Hills/Wilson/55&Over8.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesShalle VanHorn / Deborah Lamphier vs Sandra Bevilacqua-Kuhn / Danielle Haggar0-6, 2-6
2024-03-13vs Riverhills - T. ManganelloLost 01
L#2 DoublesJune Williams / Shalle VanHorn vs Nancy Nowakowski / Denise Saltman0-6, 0-6
2024-02-24vs Cheval - D. JacksonLost 02
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Davis / Shalle VanHorn vs Melany Jablonski / Lisa Durkin2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJune Williams / Deborah Lamphier vs Helen Chan / Teresa Rizzo2-6, 1-6
2024-02-10vs HCC Play it Forward - K. ArmagostLost 01
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Davis / Shalle VanHorn vs Jenny Hughes / Julie Wakefield2-6, 2-6
2024-01-29vs Hills/Wilson/55&Over8.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeborah Lamphier / Leanne Brown vs Katie Healy / Danielle Haggar0-6, 3-6
2024-01-13vs Riverhills - T. ManganelloLost 01
L#3 DoublesShalle VanHorn / Suzanne Davis vs Wanda Butler / Brigitte Paola6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Ethel Murphy
published
3.72
Carolyn Murnane
published 4
3.69
Leanne Brown
published
3.43
Johnna Cunningham
published
Deborah Lamphier
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Suzanne Davis
published
3.12
Marie Barkett
published
3.02
Shalle VanHorn
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.00
Marilyn Samaha
published
Jill Shepard
published
SHERI ELLIS
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Murnane + Leanne Brown4164% games+5.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ethel Murphy
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.90
4
Carolyn Murnane
33W–25L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Leanne Brown
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Johnna Cunningham
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Deborah Lamphier
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzanne Davis
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
Marie Barkett
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
Shalle VanHorn
54W–73L career · 5 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
Marilyn Samaha
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
Jill Shepard
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
SHERI ELLIS
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.