Teams

Rainey-Gomez/Springdale/FAC

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.10 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Yulia McClelland
published
3.32
Loudy Bousman
published
3.31
Michele Senlikci
published
Ellen Rainey
published 3.5
3.22
Laura Kryzanowsky
published
3.04
Sherry Fitzgerald
published
2.87
Sherry Lux
published
2.87
Carolina Gomez
published 3
2.74
Brittany Adair
published 3
2.72
Juliette Toothaker
published
2.68
Christy Haggard
published 3
2.32
Cezanne Garlinghouse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Katie Maner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry Lux + Carolina Gomez8163% games+6.0% vs expected
Laura Kryzanowsky + Michele Senlikci9453% games+5.8% vs expected
Brittany Adair + Cezanne Garlinghouse1441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yulia McClelland
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
Loudy Bousman
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Michele Senlikci
39W–36L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Ellen Rainey
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Kryzanowsky
19W–27L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Sherry Fitzgerald
32W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.04
Sherry Lux
15W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Carolina Gomez
15W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Brittany Adair
21W–25L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Juliette Toothaker
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Christy Haggard
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Cezanne Garlinghouse
11W–42L career · 1 line in 2022
92%8%<1%
2.32
Katie Maner
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.