Teams

BASALT

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - ASPEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-27vs GSCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Cleveland / Anna Wessel vs Brenda Grumley / Joely Larsen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-20vs GSCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Cleveland / Shelley Lundh vs Meg Kernahan / Amy Roggie6-4, 6-2
2023-09-13vs GSCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Cleveland / Shelley Lundh vs Brenda Grumley / Meg Kernahan3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-09-06vs GSCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Boyd / Dawn Cleveland vs Amy Roggie / Joely Larsen2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesShelley Lundh / Anna Wessel vs Kerri Heyl / Meg Kernahan6-0, 6-3
2023-08-31vs GSCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Cleveland / Anna Wessel vs Brenda Grumley / Kerri Heyl7-5, 6-3
2023-08-30vs GSCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Cleveland / Anna Wessel vs Kerri Heyl / Brenda Grumley4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - ASPEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BASALT5113514108
2GSCC SILVER5113514129
3GSCC WHITE3310817128
4CROWN339919133

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Shelley Lundh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Dawn Cleveland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Alexandra Braeger
published 3.5
3.42
Mary Boyd
published
Anna Wessel
published
Kayla Artino
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelley Lundh + Dawn Cleveland5543% games−11.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Shelley Lundh
75W–121L career · 3 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Dawn Cleveland
47W–43L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Alexandra Braeger
72W–36L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
Mary Boyd
26W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Anna Wessel
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kayla Artino
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.