Teams

Buziak/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.5 Women 18 & over

16 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-01vs Peterson/MemphisWon 32
L#1 DoublesMargaret Martin / Meredith Canale vs Emily Stolnicki / Fabricia Darosa6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRebekah Kingsley vs Autumn Rich6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Beth Gabriel / Haley Moore vs Janet Grillis / Sarah Holtgrewe6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJennings Barnes vs Madelaine Cable4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAudrey Belvin / Amy Poag vs Jennifer Green / Marjorie Noldon6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Haley Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Margaret Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Audrey Belvin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Rachel Purdom
published
3.18
Kelley Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Cristy Buziak
published 3.5
3.16
Rebekah Kingsley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.10
Courtney Wright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Kacie Butterworth
published
3.08
Laura Beth Gabriel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Lauren Albertine
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.00
Meredith Canale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Jennings Barnes
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.93
Amy Poag
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Sarah Spinosa
published
2.79
Karen Kassen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Canale + Laura Beth Gabriel4352% games+0.7% vs expected
Haley Moore + Laura Beth Gabriel5067% gamesnot enough data
Meredith Canale + Haley Moore314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Kassen + Amy Poag033 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Belvin + Amy Poag213 matchesnot enough data
Kelley Smith + Courtney Wright213 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Wright + Haley Moore303 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Canale + Margaret Martin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Haley Moore
15W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Margaret Martin
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Audrey Belvin
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Rachel Purdom
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Kelley Smith
13W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Cristy Buziak
16W–23L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Rebekah Kingsley
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Courtney Wright
23W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Kacie Butterworth
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Laura Beth Gabriel
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
Lauren Albertine
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Meredith Canale
19W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Jennings Barnes
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Amy Poag
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Sarah Spinosa
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Karen Kassen
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.