Teams

Dentoni - Wildcats

2024 Montgomery Combo Fall · Montgomery Combo Fall 6.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.45 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-12-21vs Ahmed - Get A GripWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hok / Desiree Drakakis vs Marie Sokoloff / Lesli Thompson6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDenise Levis / Mia Dentoni vs Emily Barry / Tisha Tyson6-0, 7-5
2024-12-17Won 30
W#1 DoublesDenise Levis / Natalie Watkins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMeaghan Curry / Mia Dentoni vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVictoria Quint / Cindy Pohoryles vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-12-14vs Ahmed - Get A GripLost 01
L#2 DoublesPamela Gambon / Cindy Pohoryles vs Marie Sokoloff / Casey Royster1-6, 0-6
2024-12-04vs Kau - First ServeWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeghan Smith / Diana Talesnick vs Chengyin Wu / Wenxi Li6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMeghan Smith / Elizabeth Hok vs Regina Farrington / Rui Liu6-3, 6-1
2024-11-16vs Kau - First ServeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMeghan Smith / Kim Barrow vs Prashila Dullabh / Nicole Ifill6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCindy Pohoryles / Pamela Gambon vs Jennifer Spence / Pamela KANSTOROOM1-6, 2-6
2024-11-08vs Davis - Tie BreakersWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmber Surmiller / Denise Levis vs Liz Price / Justine Handelman6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesDiana Talesnick / Denise Levis vs Marie Israelite / Abigail Suarez6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVictoria Quint / Meaghan Curry vs Lisa Thomas / Chao Wang6-0, 7-5
2024-10-06vs Davis - Tie BreakersWon 10
W#1 DoublesVictoria Quint / Denise Levis vs Liz Price / Robin Rudowitz6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-03vs Cornelius - Sugar 'n SliceWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiana Talesnick / Natalie Watkins vs Stacey Corcoran / Margaret Cornelius6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Hok / Meaghan Curry vs Elizabeth Nicholson / Lenora Rigby6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Fall 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Diana Talesnick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Desiree Drakakis
published 4
3.55
Meaghan Curry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Meghan Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Denise Levis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Amber Surmiller
published 3.5
3.23
Elizabeth Hok
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Carina Villagra
published 3.5
3.15
Victoria Quint
published
2.95
Mia Dentoni
published
2.74
Cindy Pohoryles
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Gail Ribas
published
2.64
Pamela Gambon
published
Bonnie Skafte
published 2.5
Natalie Watkins
published
Suzanne Singer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meaghan Curry + Meghan Smith11169% games+5.9% vs expected
Diana Talesnick + Denise Levis7262% gamesnot enough data
Meghan Smith + Denise Levis3450% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Gambon + Carina Villagra123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Talesnick
90W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Desiree Drakakis
20W–22L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Meaghan Curry
84W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Meghan Smith
160W–93L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Denise Levis
131W–88L career · 8 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amber Surmiller
21W–37L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Elizabeth Hok
123W–134L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Carina Villagra
16W–16L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Victoria Quint
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Mia Dentoni
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Cindy Pohoryles
56W–96L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
Gail Ribas
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
Pamela Gambon
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
2.64
2.5
Bonnie Skafte
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Natalie Watkins
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzanne Singer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.