Teams

Garretson/Johnson/LR/BP

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring 2 League 2.5 Novice · 2.5 Novice - Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.70 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-15vs Lincicome/Jones/Sherwood/STCWon 21
W#1 DoublesConstance Lovelace / Brandy Utter vs Chika White / Meghan Henry6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesStefanie Leacock vs Lauren Dymna1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJenny Belz / Katrinka Shields vs Jessica Morris / Courtney Mcculley6-2, 6-1
2026-04-06vs Lincicome/Jones/Sherwood/STCLost 12
L#1 DoublesStefanie Leacock / Brandy Utter vs Courtney Mcculley / Meghan Henry6-7
L#1 SinglesAndrea Hopkins vs Katie Stockton4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Hudson / Jenny Belz vs Chika White / Laura McEwen3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-03-23vs Freeman/LR/RebLost 03
L#1 DoublesJenny Belz / Kimberly Smith vs Becca Swarna / Jill Richardson1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAshley Mcmillan vs Lauren Henry1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrandy Utter / Andrea Hopkins vs Veronica Schardein / Erin Green6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2026-03-19vs Diemer/Jones/Sherwood/STCLost 12
L#1 DoublesStefanie Leacock / Constance Lovelace vs Shirley Nelson / Ashley Beach5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Barker vs Heather Poppy6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Hudson / Andrea Hopkins vs Tiffany Diemer / Sonya New5-7, 3-6
2026-03-09vs Freeman/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrandy Utter / Stefanie Leacock vs Callie Cox / Emily Russ6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesConstance Lovelace vs Jill Richardson1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Barker / Kimberly Smith vs Becca Swarna / Lauren Henry6-4, 6-2
2026-03-03vs Diemer/Jones/Sherwood/STCLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Barker / Constance Lovelace vs Shirley Nelson / Kenya Sharp1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAndrea Hopkins / Ashley Mcmillan vs Katie Place / Heather Poppy5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Novice - Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Diemer/Jones/Sherwood/STC6015311147
2Freeman/LR/Reb3371126165
3Lincicome/Jones/Sherwood/STC249920157
4Garretson/Johnson/LR/BP1551326178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Deanna Garretson
published 3.5
2.37
Jenny Belz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.19
Brandy Utter
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.15
Sarah Barker
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.13
Constance Lovelace
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.07
Andrea Hopkins
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.04
Stefanie Leacock
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.03
Ashley Mcmillan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Katrinka Shields
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stefanie Leacock + Brandy Utter033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deanna Garretson
22W–29L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Jenny Belz
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Brandy Utter
1W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Sarah Barker
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
2.5
Constance Lovelace
6W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Andrea Hopkins
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Stefanie Leacock
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Ashley Mcmillan
2W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Katrinka Shields
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.