Teams

ACB-Kelling

2026 ADULT 18 & Over · 3.0 Men (A18)

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-27vs TTC-WalkingshawLost 12
L#1 DoublesRyan Kelling / Packy Deenihan vs Eric Walkingshaw / Glenn Berman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJerry Cronen / Josh Miller vs Wynn Cudmore / Don Sinex1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Cox / Brent Stovesand vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-04vs STSC-ColemanLost 13
W#1 DoublesJeff Cox / Packy Deenihan vs Ryan Coleman / Ephraim Zuckerman6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJordan Cannon vs Scott Fox1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Kelling / Zack Peacock vs Matthew Schrumpf / Brady Larson2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJames Knox vs Liam Duncan6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2026-03-15vs SOR-ESTC-GlesmannLost 23
L#1 DoublesJeff Cox / Jonathan Lebe vs Mark Nash / Don Hakala7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJames Knox vs Christopher Glesmann6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTor Brown / Zack Peacock vs Henry Weathers / Tao Chen3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJordan Cannon vs ROGER PLANT6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRyan Kelling / Samuel Young vs Michael Guo / Carlos Posas3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men (A18) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
James Knox
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.88
Jeff Cox
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Josh Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Ryan Kelling
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Jerry Cronen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.20
Matt Wason
published 2.5
Jonathan Lebe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jordan Cannon
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Packy Deenihan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Samuel Young
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tor Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Zack Peacock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James Knox
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Jeff Cox
6W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Josh Miller
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Ryan Kelling
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Jerry Cronen
3W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
2.5
Matt Wason
0W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
Jonathan Lebe
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jordan Cannon
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Packy Deenihan
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Samuel Young
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tor Brown
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Zack Peacock
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.