Teams

Coopwood/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.5 Men 18 & over

15 players · average NTRP 3.30 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-22vs LaBonia/MemphisLost 04
L#1 DoublesNatrez Crawford / Garrett Meggs vs Bret Boscaccy / Court Ogilvie2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMiles Miller vs Jamie Marszalek6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSamuel Corcoran vs Karthick Kumaran4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTimon Amirani / Reid Corcoran vs Mike Galdieri / James Latham6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Garrett Meggs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Matt Stark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Chad Alford
published 3.5
3.04
Chris Garner
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Reid Stuart
published
2.99
Alan Kirk
published 3.5
2.99
Samuel Corcoran
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.96
Ryan Coopwood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Corey Richter
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.94
Garrett Weinberg
published
2.82
Alan Willis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Miles Miller
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Natrez Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Reid Corcoran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Timon Amirani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alan Kirk + Matt Stark2547% games+0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Garrett Meggs
13W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Matt Stark
15W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
3.5
Chad Alford
6W–23L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Chris Garner
11W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Reid Stuart
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3.5
Alan Kirk
11W–21L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Samuel Corcoran
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Ryan Coopwood
28W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Corey Richter
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Garrett Weinberg
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Alan Willis
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Miles Miller
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Natrez Crawford
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Reid Corcoran
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Timon Amirani
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.