Teams

Seminole Lake Kelsey

2023 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-18Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Stacey Reznicek2-6, 2-6
2023-03-11vs Pinellas/Gross/18&Over3.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesSue Francis / Lina Chaves vs Jill MacNeil / Trisha Shirkey1-6, 0-6
2023-03-04vs SPTC Holliday 3.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesLina Chaves / Sue Francis vs Kenzier McIntyre / Esthela Gonzalez5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaggie Berning / Ann Davis vs Deborah Bianchi / Mindy McCord4-6, 6-7
2023-02-25vs Belleair Del BassoLost 01
L#1 DoublesArlene Fricke / Christine Price vs Karen Fischer / Cambria Whalen3-6, 2-6
2023-02-18vs Pinellas/Gross/18&Over3.5WSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLina Chaves / Sue Francis vs Sandra Anthony / Christine Campbell6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMaggie Berning vs Sally Blush6-7, 4-6
2023-02-11vs SPTC Holliday 3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLina Chaves / Sue Francis vs Danielle Coke / Kathleen Kenyon4-6, 2-6
2023-01-28vs SPTC Holliday 3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSue Francis / Christine Price vs Samantha Romasiewicz / Diane Haymes0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Jennifer Botelho
published
Arlene Fricke
published 3.5
3.24
Carol Vitelli
published 3.5
3.21
Rachel Karioki
published
3.20
Terry Kelsey
published
3.17
Lina Chaves
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
January Moennig
published
3.08
Sue Francis
published
3.06
Kristen Pierce
published
3.02
Maggie Berning
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
3.01
Christine Price
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Julia Pierce
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Price + Lina Chaves1536% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Berning + Christine Price314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Botelho
11W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Arlene Fricke
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Carol Vitelli
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
Rachel Karioki
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Terry Kelsey
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Lina Chaves
51W–48L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
January Moennig
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Sue Francis
2W–15L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.08
Kristen Pierce
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Maggie Berning
50W–40L career · 8 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Christine Price
99W–86L career · 2 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Julia Pierce
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.