Teams

Grey Hawk - J. Hulbert

2022 Collier Adult 40 & Over Fall · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-08vs Talis Park - Hurt-SimmonsLost 01
L#2 DoublesLesley Kranites / Dina Viteretti vs Cheryl Comes / Barbara Hurt-Simmons3-6, 1-6
2021-12-01vs Marco YMCA - WashakWon 10
W#2 DoublesDina Viteretti / Lesley Kranites vs Mia Delk / Linda Keely4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-11-17vs Longshore Lake - WolpertWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristine Etten / Lesley Kranites vs Kristine Bergenheim / Connie Mosbaugh6-2, 6-4
2021-11-10vs Marco YMCA - BurschLost 01
L#3 DoublesLesley Kranites / Linda Orlich vs Ricki Giersch / Lisa Campbell3-6, 4-6
2021-11-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesLesley Kranites / Christina Robinson vs Kate McMeekan / Dawn Strang3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-10-27vs Olde Cypress - LoomisLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Orlich / Lesley Kranites vs Brooke Sykes / Susan Crum1-6, 6-7
2021-10-13vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetLost 01
L#3 DoublesLesley Kranites / Linda Orlich vs Angela Darder / Nancy Kriek6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Dina Viteretti
published 3.5
3.36
Sara Martineson
published
3.02
Siobhan Powell
published
2.90
Lesley Kranites
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
Linda Orlich
published
Maureen Ahern
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Martineson + Linda Orlich4258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dina Viteretti
12W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Sara Martineson
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Siobhan Powell
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.02
Lesley Kranites
56W–66L career · 12 lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
2.90
Linda Orlich
10W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Ahern
6W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.