Teams

STrivanovic/MJessee (Blakeney)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-06vs MMetzl (Sardis)Split 22
L#1 DoublesMonica Guerra / Shikha Agrawal vs Deborah Spaugh / Holly Foley7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSandra Dickinson vs Katherine Jay6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShanin Trivanovic / Jami Stone vs Anne Wilson / Claudia Prager4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJena Barton / Paulina Coello vs Bardeen Forman / Donna Pollack6-4, 7-5
2023-05-02vs HLee (Piper Glen)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSandra Dickinson / Monica Guerra vs Allyson McDonough / Shelley Crocker0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJami Stone / Monica Larios vs Laura Brandt / Sarah Garner0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAntoinette Tan / Shikha Agrawal vs Joanne Joliet / Paula Moss1-6, 3-6
2023-04-18vs JCarney (PPRSC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesJami Stone / Sandra Dickinson vs Karin Britt / Mindy Zimmerman3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJena Barton / Monica Guerra vs Margot Bizon / Meredith BROUSE6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShanin Trivanovic / Megan Jessee vs Nanci Weil / Leslee Black6-0, 6-3
2023-04-11vs TCooper/TAmos (WSRC)Won 31
W#1 DoublesMonica Guerra / Jena Barton vs Olivia Day / Nanette Murphy4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJami Stone vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSandra Dickinson / Gianna Elden vs Tasha Cooper / Tracy Amos6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlpana Patel / Paulina Coello vs Beverly Russo / Pamela Trantham3-6, 4-6
2023-04-04vs KLee (Charlotte Indoor)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMonica Guerra / Sandra Dickinson vs Jeannine Mortenson / Jane Moncayo4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPaulina Coello / Alpana Patel vs Laura Seth / Marjorie Wagner6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-04-03vs JCrimin (BCC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesPaulina Coello / Monica Guerra vs Michelle Lynch / Reshma Vora5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesShanin Trivanovic vs Christine Hotham6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAntoinette Tan / Sandra Dickinson vs January Crimin / Terri Kletch2-6, 2-6
2023-03-14vs SHerndon (WSRC)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesMonica Guerra vs Jacqui Gentile6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSandra Dickinson / Alpana Patel vs Susan Staley / Kathy Aitken3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGianna Elden / Monica Larios vs Jeri Zangmeister / Jurga Petrikis0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-03-07vs HLee (Piper Glen)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesPaulina Coello / Monica Guerra vs Allyson McDonough / Stephanie Rock2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesShanin Trivanovic vs Kathy Harborne6-7, 1-3
L#2 DoublesAlpana Patel / Monica Larios vs TAMMIE BRANDT / Shelley Crocker4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Jessee / Shikha Agrawal vs Sally Hogan / Sarah Garner0-6, 1-6
2023-02-28vs MMetzl (Sardis)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJami Stone / Shanin Trivanovic vs Elizabeth Hartzog / Stephanie Eickenhorst6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Monica Larios
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Shanin Trivanovic
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.88
Jami Stone
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.84
Paulina Coello
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.83
Monica Guerra
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 3
2.64
Megan Jessee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Sandra Dickinson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.50
Shikha Agrawal
published
2.43
Alpana Patel
published 3
2.42
Antoinette Tan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Antoinette Tan + Megan Jessee51245% games−1.6% vs expected
Paulina Coello + Monica Larios10654% gamesnot enough data
Monica Larios + Monica Guerra8751% gamesnot enough data
Paulina Coello + Monica Guerra2844% gamesnot enough data
Shanin Trivanovic + Monica Larios3449% gamesnot enough data
Shanin Trivanovic + Megan Jessee4352% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Dickinson + Antoinette Tan3256% gamesnot enough data
Shanin Trivanovic + Paulina Coello314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Monica Larios
57W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Shanin Trivanovic
54W–61L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
2.90
3
Jami Stone
95W–94L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%79%20%
2.88
3
Paulina Coello
35W–50L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Monica Guerra
55W–47L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Megan Jessee
45W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Sandra Dickinson
35W–44L career · 7 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
2.64
Shikha Agrawal
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Alpana Patel
0W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.43
3
Antoinette Tan
69W–117L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.