Teams

Marco YMCA - D. Snyder

2021 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-03-04vs DoubleTrouble - Cambier - TrombleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesRuth Holland / Lori Ceryak vs Ilene Flack / Josee Theriault4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-02-25vs Fiddlers Creek - FioreLost 02
L#1 DoublesDawn Amato / Lisa Campbell vs Shawn Fiore / Lisa Friedman4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDana Sacks / Denise Snyder vs Dawn Cooper / Donna Burns4-6, 0-6
2021-02-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesRuth Holland / Brenda Phillips vs Ellen Robie / Sharon Sheline6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLisa Campbell / Susan Miller vs Dawn Cyr / Carol Valla4-6, 1-6
2021-02-04vs VineyardsBAM - KronenLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Amato / Lisa Campbell vs Lynda Guba / Kristi Klukas7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2021-01-28vs Sterling Oaks - T. WeinsteinWon 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Amato / Dana Sacks vs Jeri Carley / Anne Pauls6-2, 6-2
2021-01-14vs Valencia Bonita - P. DoranLost 01
L#3 DoublesDana Sacks / Denise Snyder vs Sue Capps / Joann Taylor6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2021-01-07vs World Tennis Center - L. ChappellSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDawn Amato / Lisa Campbell vs Lynn Lauck / Julie Meyer2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDana Sacks / Denise Snyder vs Sharon Slozil / Margaret Farmar7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Dana Sacks
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.45
Lisa Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Lori Ceryak
published
3.22
Monica Erne
published
2.93
Ruth Holland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Campbell + Dana Sacks14954% games−4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dana Sacks
218W–149L career · 4 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
Lisa Campbell
131W–100L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.45
Lori Ceryak
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Monica Erne
12W–4L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
Ruth Holland
23W–38L career · 4 lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.