Teams

Vissering

2026 Howard Mixed 18 & Over · Howard Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-20vs DaRosso - Matty's BaddiesWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeonard Tetteh / Hillary Kuker vs Jake Lazer / Julie Lazer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHayan Marouf / Jessica Lee vs Matthew DaRosso / Lauren Gurney6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAngel Batkins / Renaldo Savady vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-14vs HocoCha9.0 18+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesIrene Chen / Luis Lozano vs Eve Helmer / Henry McVeigh2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHillary Kuker / Leonard Tetteh vs Jean Lim / Liviu Carare6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAlison Bailey / Lukas Sanidas vs Jin Lei / Koby Bonta2-6, 6-7
2026-03-06vs HocoCha9.0 18+Won 21
W#1 DoublesIrene Chen / Leonard Tetteh vs Henry McVeigh / Jean Lim6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHayan Marouf / Jessica Lee vs Koby Bonta / Jin Lei6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHillary Kuker / Matthew Geppi vs Liviu Carare / Ruchi Nanda6-4, 7-6
2026-02-28vs YeeWon 21
L#1 DoublesAustin Blake / Farzaneh Navid vs Roderick Peyton / Soyoung Lee4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLuis Lozano / Irene Chen vs Iosua Malaki / Dian Zhang7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeather Carr / Jan Neumann vs Brent Kendall / Meghan Damico6-2, 6-2
2026-02-21vs DaRosso - Matty's BaddiesLost 12
W#1 DoublesLeonard Tetteh / Ana Maria Pena Castro vs Kaitlyn Heo / Ji Cha7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHung Nguyen / Alison Bailey vs Richard Abruscato / Rachel Martinez7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeather Carr / Jan Neumann vs Jake Lazer / Lauren Gurney5-7, 4-6
2026-02-15vs HocoCha9.0 18+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesHeather Carr / Jan Neumann vs Eve Helmer - * / Henry McVeigh1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHillary Kuker / Leonard Tetteh vs Susan Rhee / Dennis Wang6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAna Maria Pena Castro / Nathan Leslie vs Ruchi Nanda / Liviu Carare6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2026-01-31vs YeeLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatthew Geppi / Irene Chen vs Soyoung Lee / Roderick Peyton2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAustin Blake / Jessica Lee vs Endre Esztergomi / Taeeui Ham6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJonathan Vissering / Hillary Kuker vs Iosua Malaki / Dian Zhang6-7, 4-6
2026-01-23vs DaRosso - Matty's BaddiesWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Lee / Hayan Marouf vs Jake Lazer / Julie Lazer6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAna Maria Pena Castro / Jonathan Vissering vs Richard Abruscato / Rachel Martinez0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlison Bailey / Luis Lozano vs Kaitlyn Heo / Mitchell Furst6-0, 6-3
2026-01-10vs YeeWon 21
W#1 DoublesAustin Blake / Farzaneh Navid vs Jay Yee / Soyoung Lee4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNathan Leslie / Hillary Kuker vs Michael Liu / Dian Zhang6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesRenaldo Savady / Angel Batkins vs Johan Holmberg / Arina Kravitz6-7, 2-6
2026-01-03vs DaRosso - Matty's BaddiesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAna Maria Pena Castro / Luis Lozano vs Matthew DaRosso / Elizabeth Balanis6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLukas Sanidas / Hillary Kuker vs Lauren Gurney / Ryan Cinoman6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Angel Batkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.71
Austin Blake
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.43
Heather Carr
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.39
Luis Lozano
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.37
Matthew Geppi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
Ana Maria Pena Castro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.27
Leonard Tetteh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
Nathan Leslie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.20
Jan Neumann
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.19
Jonathan Vissering
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.13
Lukas Sanidas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Alison Bailey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Farzaneh Navid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Renaldo Savady
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Hayan Marouf
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Hillary Kuker
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Hung Nguyen
published
Irene Chen
published
Jessica Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Austin Blake + Farzaneh Navid5156% games+4.2% vs expected
Jan Neumann + Heather Carr6750% games+0.4% vs expected
Jonathan Vissering + Hillary Kuker123 matchesnot enough data
Leonard Tetteh + Hillary Kuker213 matchesnot enough data
Luis Lozano + Alison Bailey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Angel Batkins
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.80
5
Austin Blake
17W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.71
Heather Carr
40W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
4.43
Luis Lozano
67W–31L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
4.39
4.5
Matthew Geppi
225W–81L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
4.37
4.5
Ana Maria Pena Castro
43W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
4.30
4.5
Leonard Tetteh
336W–208L career · 12 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Nathan Leslie
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Jan Neumann
89W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Jonathan Vissering
357W–182L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Lukas Sanidas
142W–110L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Alison Bailey
23W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.10
4
Farzaneh Navid
117W–111L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
4.08
4
Renaldo Savady
224W–182L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Hayan Marouf
10W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Hillary Kuker
7W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Hung Nguyen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Irene Chen
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jessica Lee
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.