Teams

Cottonwood Club-Ricker/Haverkost

2023 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 3.0W

17 players · average NTRP 3.23 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-13vs Red Ledges-Overton/WoodLost 12
W#1 Female DoublesKatie Winson / Krissie Summerhays vs Shana Wood / Carly Johnston6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesJamuna Nielsen / Melissa Child vs Stefanie Maddox / Megan Overton3-6, 3-6
L#3 Female DoublesLindsay Duckworth / Robin Asmar vs Clarissa McLeod / Melissa Smith6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 Female DoublesKatie Winson / Lindy Parks vs Mary Jayne Child / Lisa Armstrong6-3, 6-2
2023-12-06vs Park City MARC-Krueger/ByrneLost 03
L#1 Female DoublesLindsay Duckworth / Taylor Haverkost vs Kelly Krueger / Annie Tilton4-6, 2-6
L#2 Female DoublesMelissa Child / Krissie Summerhays vs Kathleen DiCesaris / Melanie Schlachter2-6, 3-5
L#3 Female DoublesHolly Ricker / Alison Barber vs Lauren Karr / Sarah Yates3-6, 2-6
2023-11-29vs Sports Mall-Weaver/MajorsSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesKrissie Summerhays / Katie Winson vs Lisa Beames / Alison Pearce5-7, 2-4
W#2 Female DoublesRobin Asmar / Melissa Child vs Karlene Johnston / Jeri Nichols6-4, 5-3
2023-11-15Lost 01
L#1 Female SinglesLindsay Duckworth vs Jennifer Hoffman3-6, 4-3, 0-1
2023-11-08vs Sunpro-Belliston/AndersonSplit 11
W#2 Female DoublesKrissie Summerhays / Katie Winson vs Shannon Fredericks / Cherylin Winkel6-3, 6-2
L#3 Female DoublesHolly Ricker / Melissa Child vs Gina Anderson / Kim Ward7-5, 0-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 3.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Weaver/Majors6016819164
2Provo High School-Page5116820179
3Sunpro-Belliston/Anderson4216821176
4Ivory Ridge-McCord/Wily42141022182
5Park City MARC-Krueger/Byrne4215922164
6Wasatch Rec Center-Studdert/McBride3211922173
7Sunpro-Marshall33121227181
8Cottonwood Club-Ricker/Haverkost33111329205
9Sunpro-Donaldson/Cardall2381227184
10Sports Mall-George/Wood24121227202
11Red Ledges-Overton/Wood15111329217
12Ogden-Cox/Johnstun1571737243
13Salt Lake Tennis-Farnsworth/Bickmore0632146275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Taylor Haverkost
usually #1 Female Doubles 40%, also #1 Female Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Lori Carter
published
3.30
Haley H Moreno
published
3.17
Lindsay Duckworth
usually #1 Female Singles 33%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Lindy Parks
usually #3 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Kerry Davis
published
3.04
Ally Lyle
published 3
3.01
Jamuna Nielsen
usually #1 Female Singles 25%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.94
Katie Winson
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #2 Female Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Melissa Child
usually #2 Female Doubles 75%, also #3 Female Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Krissie Summerhays
usually #2 Female Doubles 40%, also #1 Female Doubles 40% · published 3
Alison Barber
published 3
Alison Parsons
published 3
2.49
Holly Ricker
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
Kelly Lund
published
Robin Asmar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Davis + Lindsay Duckworth2454% games+13.8% vs expected
Kerry Davis + Lori Carter5260% games+12.0% vs expected
Melissa Child + Haley H Moreno7066% games+11.5% vs expected
Katie Winson + Taylor Haverkost4170% games+8.5% vs expected
Lori Carter + Haley H Moreno11162% games+7.5% vs expected
Alison Barber + Jamuna Nielsen5450% games+5.7% vs expected
Taylor Haverkost + Lori Carter15660% games+3.6% vs expected
Jamuna Nielsen + Melissa Child3449% games+3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Taylor Haverkost
138W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
Lori Carter
107W–54L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Haley H Moreno
82W–46L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Lindsay Duckworth
43W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Lindy Parks
120W–90L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
Kerry Davis
35W–30L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Ally Lyle
43W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Jamuna Nielsen
126W–120L career · 8 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Katie Winson
128W–122L career · 4 lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Melissa Child
73W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Krissie Summerhays
109W–122L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Alison Barber
16W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Alison Parsons
20W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Holly Ricker
57W–151L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.49
Kelly Lund
37W–37L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Magdalena Kovacsovics
50W–82L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robin Asmar
25W–65L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.