← Teams

MV-Harlan

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.36 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Alex Harbell
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.29
Michael Kardas
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Jeff Marcus
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Dennis Pelton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Robert Piercy
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published 3.5
—
Nathan Gwin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.34
Wesley Eader
usually #2 Singles 64%, also #1 Singles 9% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2024-03-31Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesJeff Marcus / Michael Kardas vs Eric Ayers / Jeff Anhaltzer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Clark / Nathan Gwin vs Ian Schnadig / Xiaolin Nan7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesWesley Eader vs Joshua Slate6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRobert Piercy / Kevin Sullivan vs Octavian Tudorache / Yongping Liu6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-24Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesAlex Harbell / Dennis Pelton vs Dan Bingham / John van Leeuwen6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichael Kardas / Jeff Marcus vs Thomas Greiner / Peter Kim5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-03-23Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesMichael Kardas / Nathan Gwin vs Xavier Oberlander / Joe Malboeuf4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlex Harbell vs John Boelling3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Piercy / Richard Clark vs Eric Schniewind / Ken Dragoon4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKevin Sullivan / Wesley Eader vs David Williams / Paul Kim6-1, 6-3
2024-03-16Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMichael Kardas / Rich Johnson vs Edmundo Arroyo / Dennis Deng6-1, 7-5
L#2 SinglesNathan Gwin vs Tri Pham6-0, 6-0
2024-03-10Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesAlex Harbell / Michael Kardas vs Jeffrey Bayless / Richard Sohn6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDennis Pelton / Jeff Marcus vs MICHAEL DOHERTY / Chris Hasle2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-03-03Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJeff Marcus / Robert Piercy vs Eric Ayers / Jeff Anhaltzer6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDennis Pelton / Nathan Gwin vs Andy Alfonso / Ian Schnadig6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesWesley Eader vs Mikhail Golovnykh6-4, 6-0
2024-02-04Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesJeff Marcus / Rich Johnson vs Sebastian Llados Vila / Suresh Patibandla6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAlex Harbell vs Justin Levinsohn7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKevin Sullivan / Nathan Gwin vs MADHUKAR PURUMANDLA / Sreekanth Pidugu7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Piercy / Richard Clark vs Stefano Cavallucci / Seth Wagner6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-01-28Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesJeff Marcus / Dennis Pelton vs Chris MacMillan / Kenny Wong7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAlex Harbell vs Jaime Perez6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesNathan Gwin / Rich Johnson vs Kevin Jian / Sanh Trinh6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Piercy / Richard Clark vs Jeremy Chiang / John Rutledge6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Alex Harbell
127W–53L career
5%95%0%
3.67
3.5
Michael Kardas
27W–50L career
0%99%1%
3.29
3.5
Jeff Marcus
34W–49L career
2%95%3%
3.28
3.5
Dennis Pelton
15W–32L career
8%87%5%
3.25
3.5
Robert Piercy
88W–79L career
1%99%0%
3.22
3
Nathan Gwin
26W–33L career
not enough data
—
2.5
Wesley Eader
55W–103L career · type A
0%79%21%
2.34

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.