Teams

LATA40/Curtis/BP

2025 Adult 40 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 3.0 - Night

13 players · average NTRP 2.92 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-04vs LATA40/Geib/CAMPLost 14
L#1 DoublesLeslie Proctor / Nancie Shillington-Perez vs Lisette Geib / Willine Gilliard0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Curtis vs Chrissy Boone0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJackie McNeal / Julie Weinzapfel vs Beth Belcher / Gina Wilkie0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesHanna Gregorio / Roxana Meetze vs Theresa Marcott / Jenny Burden4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesGlenda Manning / Cindy Priselac vs Stephanie Bilger / Malissa Hulon4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.0 - Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Nancie Shillington-Perez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Jayne Woodward
published
2.81
Danette Todd
published 3
Hanna Gregorio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Leslie Proctor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Cindy Priselac
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Michelle Hipp
published
2.67
Deborah Poston
published 3
2.60
Roxana Meetze
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Glenda Manning
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.39
Lisa Curtis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jackie McNeal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Julie Weinzapfel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jayne Woodward + Leslie Proctor3251% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Priselac + Leslie Proctor224 matchesnot enough data
Glenda Manning + Jayne Woodward404 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Priselac + Glenda Manning123 matchesnot enough data
Danette Todd + Roxana Meetze213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancie Shillington-Perez
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.93
Jayne Woodward
32W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Danette Todd
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Hanna Gregorio
23W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Proctor
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Cindy Priselac
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Michelle Hipp
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Deborah Poston
18W–22L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.67
Roxana Meetze
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Glenda Manning
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Lisa Curtis
14W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.39
2.5
Jackie McNeal
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Julie Weinzapfel
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.