Teams

BP RED

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-27vs NJ REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnna Armstrong / Judith Law vs Tara Hammar / Jennifer Lyons3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJessica Pierce vs Adrienne Tosto6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMolly Smith / Celine Fucci vs Erin Manzolillo / April DeLauro5-7, 1-6
2026-08-20vs NJ PINKLost 12
L#1 DoublesArlene Maiava / Molly Smith vs Wanda Shepherd / Lisa Sullivan3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJessica Pierce vs Kimberly Martin0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnna Armstrong / Katie Todd vs Nancy Stapp / Becky Myers6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-06vs LTC-M YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesCeline Fucci / Amy Dre vs Amy Whittier / Laura Read1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Pierce vs KATIE GUYON5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Gallo / Judith Law vs Clarissa Manzi / Emily Adams6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-30vs LTC-D REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Gallo / Katie Todd vs Linda Sexton / April Kobayashi7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAnna Armstrong vs Leigh Goerke3-6, 2-6
2026-07-23vs NJ REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesArlene Maiava / Amy Dre vs Angela Hale / Jennifer Lyons6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCeline Fucci vs Denise Champion6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnna Armstrong / Katie Todd vs Kris Hansen / Laura Larkins7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Jessica Pierce
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Amy Dre
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Arlene Maiava
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Anna Armstrong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Natalie Brader
published
3.10
Celine Fucci
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Susan Gallo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Judith Law
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Katie Todd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Law + Susan Gallo11938% games−5.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Pierce
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Amy Dre
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Arlene Maiava
5W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Anna Armstrong
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Natalie Brader
7W–18L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Celine Fucci
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Susan Gallo
13W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Judith Law
16W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Katie Todd
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.