Teams

DTC BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-09vs SKY REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Cox / Sumant Bhat vs James Mejia / Richard Heth6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLuis Fernandez / Matthew Palmer vs Arthur Turnbill / Scott Justus6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesConnor McKim / Will Essin vs Greg Thiessen / Andy Duncan6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-02vs NJ REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesLuis Fernandez / Matthew Palmer vs Albert Eng / Troy Wilson7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTyler Coyle / Connor McKim vs Timothy Kacmar / Matthew Baumgart7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Biermann / Sumant Bhat vs Travis Staebell / Meng Lian6-3, 6-2
2026-06-25vs DTC GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesPhilip Dankner / Matthew Dankner vs Robert Gillock / Jonathan Musser3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTyler Coyle vs Neil Allman6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTaylor Lawton / David Biermann vs Mark Raventos / Danny Bartell6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWill Essin / Luis Fernandez vs Thomas Tsai / Thomas Fitzgerald6-1, 6-3
2026-06-18vs WP BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Swank / Luis Fernandez vs Michael Matthews / Mickey Plotkin6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Dankner / Connor McKim vs Matthew Hooper / John Wharton6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTaylor Lawton / Sumant Bhat vs Paul Wrona / James Elsworth6-7, 6-7
2026-06-11vs WP-C GOLDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavid Biermann / Sumant Bhat vs Brian Nelson / Bryan Nykerk4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJason Groom vs Brent Anderson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesConnor McKim / Matthew Dankner vs Herb Miller / Michael Alexander6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChris Swank / Luis Fernandez vs Sameer Mehta / James Sanders6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-04vs MC GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Biermann / Jason Groom vs Chip Pew / David Gerbosi6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTaylor Lawton / Connor McKim vs Shane Carroll / Adam Gilden6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPhilip Dankner / Matthew Dankner vs Larry Middle / William Bonthron6-0, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.34 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Connor McKim
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.43
David Biermann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.42
Taylor Lawton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.40
Matthew Dankner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.40
Tyler Coyle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.40
Matthew Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.38
Edwin Feeny
published 4.5
4.34
Sumant Bhat
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.33
Luis Fernandez
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.32
Jason Groom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.29
Chris Swank
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.19
Philip Dankner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.98
Benoit Guin
published 4.5
Will Essin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luis Fernandez + Chris Swank13361% games+3.6% vs expected
Matthew Dankner + Philip Dankner6651% games+0.6% vs expected
Luis Fernandez + Edwin Feeny404 matchesnot enough data
Benoit Guin + David Biermann404 matchesnot enough data
Luis Fernandez + Matthew Palmer303 matchesnot enough data
Tyler Coyle + Connor McKim303 matchesnot enough data
Sumant Bhat + David Biermann213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Connor McKim
15W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.50
4.5
David Biermann
63W–21L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Taylor Lawton
58W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
4.42
4.5
Matthew Dankner
28W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
4.40
Tyler Coyle
38W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Matthew Palmer
28W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Edwin Feeny
42W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.38
Sumant Bhat
25W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
4.34
Luis Fernandez
52W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.33
Jason Groom
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
4.32
4.5
Chris Swank
78W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Philip Dankner
32W–40L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Benoit Guin
16W–15L career · no lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.98
Will Essin
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.