Teams

The Avila Mutiny - B. Bailey

2023 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-18vs Florida/Orsini/55&Over9.0MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Evans / James Evans vs Gabriel Mattos / Chris New7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMartin Revello / Michael Teixeira vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-11vs Florida/Orsini/55&Over9.0MWon 10
W#2 DoublesJames Evans / Paul Zack vs Brent Filbert / Samuel Biller7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-25vs Florida/Orsini/55&Over9.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesJames Evans / Jeffrey Evans vs Richard Sobieray / Gerardo Cuevas5-7, 2-6
2023-02-11vs Florida/Orsini/55&Over9.0MWon 10
W#2 DoublesJames Evans / Jeffrey Evans vs Samuel Biller / Brent Filbert6-3, 6-4
2023-02-04vs Florida/Orsini/55&Over9.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesFelix Tromp / Michael Teixeira vs Gerardo Cuevas / Richard Sobieray4-6, 2-6
2023-01-28vs Florida/Orsini/55&Over9.0MLost 02
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Evans / Jim Maskas vs Ignacio Molina / Brent Filbert4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Teixeira / Paul Zack vs Chris Canfield / Chris New5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-01-21vs Florida/Orsini/55&Over9.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Evans / Jim Maskas vs Chris Canfield / Ignacio Molina2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoseph Curtis / Michael Teixeira vs Gerardo Cuevas / Edwin Jagger2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRoger Cypriano / Alvaro Rodriguez vs Samuel Biller / Brent Filbert6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Jeffrey Evans
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.10
James Evans
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.87
Paul Zack
published
3.85
Julio Zeballos
published
3.77
Barney Bailey
published 4
3.59
Martin Revello
published
Felix Tromp
published
Jim Maskas
published
Michael Teixeira
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roger Cypriano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Evans + James Evans5949% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Evans
84W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.26
James Evans
21W–26L career · 5 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.10
Paul Zack
31W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.87
Julio Zeballos
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
3.85
4
Barney Bailey
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Martin Revello
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
3.59
Felix Tromp
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jim Maskas
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Teixeira
12W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Roger Cypriano
29W–16L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.